no because they did not have the money RUBBISH...IF YOU were wealthy, and you committed a crime, you were treated pretty much the same as the poor.
Rich Tudor homes were very fancy and boldly decorated with many different expensive items, while poor Tudor homes were often in the country where they would be built with stone and more than likely a thatched roof.
it is old looking Poor people wore rough cloth called homespun and poorly tanned leather. Rich people wore whatever they could afford. Silks, brocades , finely worked leather , boots and shoes, and undergarments, a luxury most poor people did without. rich people live with high standard and poor's don't have any standard.
they travelled in boats or in carriages but could not travel very far like theUSA they could travel aroundEngland though but that is really it and Europe
Rich people need it poor people have it
obviously the rich tudors
you idiots
Rape them
womens dresses are made of silk where poor dresses are made of wool
the poor where misteated by the rich because the rich always looked down on poor people:)
The rich people had ornate and large homes. The poor had what they could afford. As more land became enclosed for raising sheep for wool, more people became poor and lost their homes. People were sometimes forced into workhouses.
bvbvvvbb
The rich generally have more economic and political power than the poor.
Hmmm. That's a toughy. Maybe the rich were richer than the poor
rich poor have food don't have food can play have a job
You may not have a grasp on the terms rich and poor, and the difference between them.
the had music