sometimes... usually poor Victorian families would have ONE pair of shoes which the whole family would wear E.G. they would take it in turns. If they did have a pair of their own shoes they would most probably home made.
Their clothes were often hand me downs from wealthy people, or their mothers clothes cut down, so often very threadbare.
Yes
No, Because if they were boys would of distracted the girls or maybe opposite.
Rich Victorian boys went to school and the girls learnt how to be a good wife and lady so that they could carry on the teachings and be good at it in later life
dress , laced shoes,piggy tales and hat.
sexy stuff
girls and boys wear identical clothes
you wouldn't wear any size because girls shoes are made for people with smaller feet (younger girls). Girls shoes only go up so high and then womens sizes start. So if you are a size 9 in womens your feet are too big for girls shoes.
shoes, usually made of leather
4.25
They wore clothes if they could afford it
converse
yes
no they are not. Boys wear them to.
sometimes... usually poor Victorian families would have ONE pair of shoes which the whole family would wear E.G. they would take it in turns. If they did have a pair of their own shoes they would most probably home made.
Victorian teachers would wear black, flat, bootlike shoes. They really didn't earn enough to buy more fashionable shoes.