The Civil War instated the dominance of parliament as the head of British politics and law, and with its return the monarchy demoted to a head of state. Theoretically this gave the people more power, in fact it more gave the lords power.
Another key thing to note is that from this war, parliament gained control of the army for the first time. This meant that it would be up to Parliamnet where and when Britain would fight wars. This also led to the beginning of the new model army, the first professional army in the world.
The freedom from a monarch opened up political thought on what could replace it, those ideas encouraged the French Revolution and others and spread around the world.
So, without the civil war, today Britain might still be an authoritarian monarchical state instead of the representative democracy that we have, although it seems more likely something would have changed eventually
In the 17th century, the English Civil War (a set of three distinct conflicts occurring between 1642 and 1651) led in several ways to the system of government that the United Kingdom (or, England) has today. The most important result of the Civil War was the formal limitation of monarchical power in England: no longer would English kings rule absolutely; henceforth, their rule would be counter-balanced (and otherwise limited) by the English Parliament.
He was a government worker, a civil servant. Specifically, he was a Customs Official, collecting import duties at the border. This was a secure job but not very well paid. His economic status would have been lower middle class-middle class. He was also apparently a domineering drunkard.
Im not exactly sure but I would say England.
The Petition of Right
If you count Roanoke as the first colony, then, it would be Jamestown. If you count Jamestown as the first, then it would be Plymouth.
The world would be worse because we would not have good music to listen to
China would have flooded
because if he hadnt had sex with a roach we would be dead
Neither- Colorado did not become a state until 1 August 1876, eleven years after Civil War's end.
In the 17th century, the English Civil War (a set of three distinct conflicts occurring between 1642 and 1651) led in several ways to the system of government that the United Kingdom (or, England) has today. The most important result of the Civil War was the formal limitation of monarchical power in England: no longer would English kings rule absolutely; henceforth, their rule would be counter-balanced (and otherwise limited) by the English Parliament.
Slaves would fight for England. Not sure that I see the relevance, please explain. Was England significantly involved in the American Civil War, which, I assume, is what we are discussing?
Yes definetely if he hadnt figured out what he did everthing about science would be different!!
difficult to answer, who knows what the Germans would have done. the battle of Britain in may 1940 over kent south east England, was a particularly viscous dogfight in which the RAF were literally fighting for their and Britain's lives. if the RAF hadnt destroyed the luftwaffe, then Germany without doubt would have had an easier time of invading England. this defeat totally demoralised the Germans and they realised that the RAF ruled the skies.
In 1654, there was no King of England, as the monarchy had been abolished following the English Civil War. Instead, Oliver Cromwell served as the Lord Protector of the Commonwealth of England, Scotland, and Ireland, effectively ruling as a head of state. The monarchy would not be restored until 1660, with Charles II taking the throne. Cromwell's rule marked a significant period of republican governance in England.
I suspect that would be Vermont.
Darwin wouldn't of found the guanaco or the opossum if he hadnt travelled on the voyage.
* The proclamation emansepating slavery! Loncolns ruse, to keep France, and England from joining the South; in the civil war. But for that proclomation; the South would have most probably won the civil war, with France, and England as their allies. * It was a piece of propoganda; that effectivly kept both France, and England out of direct participation in the war!