Very much like the relationships between men and women now. The conventions were different, but the essence of the relationships is the same. Some people are dominating and some are more retiring. Shakespeare shows us all kinds of couples. Couples which involve a strong man and a weaker woman are Othello and Desdemona, Demetrius and Helena, and Hamlet and Ophelia. Couples with a strong woman and a weak man include Helena and Bertram, Lady Macbeth and Macbeth, Goneril and Albany, Phoebe and Silvius, and Portia and Bassanio. Couples where both are strong include Beatrice and Benedick, Antony and Cleopatra and Petruchio and Katharine. Hero and Claudio both are weak. Shakespeare would not have shown us this broad array of different relationships had the reality of his world been as monochromatic as some would like us to believe.
In other words, don't believe the hype: people then behaved very much like people do now.
Chaotic, as women weren't allowed to participate in any of the plays written by William Shakespeare As it was known for shameless and unladylike.
Hard
Life for women in 1912 was extremely unfair as they were forced to do stuff by there husbands1 and were often bullied into things2 and they had no power to vote or do anything that would change the governments ideas3.
Belle Starr is important in women history because if it was not for her life probably wouldn't like these
Majority of the people in the renaissance period would have been making their living by farming. The man took care of the farming and the women take care of poultry.
Women were treated poorly in the Elizabethan times. They were used for children and passed on like something old. They would be there fathers property until they found a man then the mans property. Usually the man would have sex with the woman to see if she was ble to have children. Then get her pregnant, marry her and use her for the rest of her worthless life. They were treated alot worse than males, almost like their slaves. If the female was to have a brother younger or older then she would be below him on so many things. Her beauty was and wasn't important. If she was beautiful, then she would get a man straight away. However if she was wealthy and beautiful then her beauty was a bonus, but if she was not pretty and rich, then men were still interested because all they cared about was the money in those days. In short, it didn't matter about looks or the personality. All the men cared about was if they could have children and if they had a bit of cash in the pocket.
It was poo
The law prohibited women from working on the stage but that did not prevent them from working backstage repairing and cleaning costumes and the like. We do not have very extensive records of who did these kinds of jobs.
Shakespeare was not relating opinions, but reflecting reality. There are some very powerful women, and Shakespearean characters like Rosalind, Viola, Goneril, Cleopatra, Mrs. Ford, Beatrice and Lady Macbeth reflect how women can use their power. Some women, and some Shakespearean characters, are much less powerful than others. That is not a point of view. That is how it is.
Yes, shakespearean comedy
Filthy and unhygienic.
Hard
what were womens life like in the early west
absolutely awful
it was har and grooling
Life was easy and fun. you had nice clothes, books, and a nice house. you were'nt allowed to play with or talk to the poor children so if you were an only child then you probably get quite bored. you also would'nt go outside very much because there were poor people outside and you could get ill.
life for women in shakespearian times both compared with men and compared with now is very diffrent because women where not able to act aka be an actress and they where put down if they did something wrong and men could act like drunken idiots...Now women today are allowed to do what men do aka they can act and perform in plays and do anything they want.......
Some do -Some don't Be yourself and find some one who likes you for yourself. Some do, some don't. Like everything in life, it's all personal preferences.