Samuel Fraunces's eldest daughter, Elizabeth, was born December 26, 1765. There is a theory that her nickname was "Phoebe", but no evidence to support this. Elizabeth would have been a 10-year-old at the time of the supposed June 1776 assassination plot against George Washington. If a "Phoebe" existed, she may have been a woman enslaved or employed by Samuel Fraunces, rather than his daughter.
There is no record of a Phoebe Fraunces ever existing. Her name does not appear with Samuel Fraunces's children in birth or baptismal records, and she is not mentioned in his Will. The 1790 U.S. Census for New York lists Samuel Fraunces as a "free white male" and a slaveholder. If a Phoebe ever existed, she may have been a woman enslaved or employed by him, rather than his daughter.
Read more: Where_did_phoebe_fraunces_live
There is no record of a Phoebe Fraunces ever existing. The name does not appear with Samuel Fraunces's children in birth or baptismal records, and she is not mentioned in his will. The 1790 U.S. Census for New York lists Sameul Fraunces as a "free white male" and a slaveholder, so if a Phoebe existed she may have been a woman enslaved or employed by him, rather than his daughter.
Probably not. Samuel Fraunces never had a daughter named Phoebe, and his eldest daughter, Elizabeth, was a 10-year-old in June 1776, the time of the supposed poisoning attempt. The first reference to a "Phoebe" Fraunces comes in a magazine story published in January 1876, a century after the supposed incident. And that story provided no documentation or source for the tale.
Phobos, Phobe, Pheobe, Phebe, Phobes, Phoebes, Phoebus (last one is a boy's name.)
he did not die he vanished and now knew where he went but he is oversly dead
Laura Secord died because of how old she was, she was 93
no....
there is no existance on elizabeth fraunces in the story "PHOEBE the spy''
There is no record of a Phoebe Fraunces ever existing. The name does not appear with Samuel Fraunces's children in birth or baptismal records, and she is not mentioned in his will. The 1790 U.S. Cenus for New York lists Samuel Fraunces as a "free white male" and a slaveholder, so if a Phoebe existed she may have been a woman enslaved or employed by him, rather than his daughter.
There is no record of a Phoebe Fraunces ever existing. The name does not appear with Samuel Fraunces's children in birth or baptismal records, and she is not mentioned in his will. The 1790 U.S. Census for New York lists Samuel Fraunces as a "free white male" and a slaveholder, so if a Phoebe ever existed she may have been a woman enslaved or employed by him, rather than his daughter.
Phoebe Fraunces is a fictional character in the book: Phoebe the Spy. There is no evidence of her existence in any documentation surrounding the Fraunces family. She was not mentioned in Samuel Fraunces will, was not found to have a baptismal certificate, and is not mentioned in any newspapers. Also, the fact that she is black, and that her father was black, is not necessarily true. Her father was called "Black" Sam, "Black" often used as a term for someone with a swarthy and ugly face.
There is no record of a Phoebe Fraunces ever existing. The name does not appear with Samuel Fraunces's children in birth or baptismal records, and she is not mentioned in his will. The 1790 U.S. Census for New York lists Sameul Fraunces as a "free white male" and a slaveholder, so if a Phoebe existed she may have been a woman enslaved or employed by him, rather than his daughter.
There is no record of a Phoebe Fraunces ever existing. The name does not appear with Samuel Fraunces's children in birth or baptismal records, and she is not mentioned in his will. The 1790 U.S. Census for New York lists Samuel Fraunces as a "free white male" and a slaveholder, so if a Phoebe ever existed she may have been a woman enslaved or employed by him, rather than his daughter.
There is no record of a Phoebe Fraunces ever existing. The name does not appear with Samuel Fraunces's children in birth or baptismal records, and she is not mentioned in his will. The 1790 U.S. Census for New York lists Sameul Fraunces as a "free white male" and a slaveholder, so if a Phoebe existed she may have been a woman enslaved or employed by him, rather than his daughter.
There is no record of a Phoebe Fraunces ever existing. The name does not appear with Samuel Fraunces's children in birth or baptismal records, and she is not mentioned in his will. The 1790 U.S. Census for New York lists Sameul Fraunces as a "free white male" and a slaveholder, so if a Phoebe existed she may have been a woman enslaved or employed by him, rather than his daughter.
There is no record of a Phoebe Fraunces ever existing. The name does not appear with Samuel Fraunces's children in birth or baptismal records, and she is not mentioned in his will. The 1790 U.S. Census for New York lists Sameul Fraunces as a "free white male" and a slaveholder, so if a Phoebe existed she may have been a woman enslaved or employed by him, rather than his daughter.
Probably not. Samuel Fraunces never had a daughter named Phoebe, and his eldest daughter, Elizabeth, was a 10-year-old in June 1776, the time of the supposed poisoning attempt. The first reference to a "Phoebe" Fraunces comes in a magazine story published in January 1876, a century after the supposed incident. And that story provided no documentation or source for the tale.
According to coroinn.com, he had seven children: Andrew, Elizabeth, Catherine, Sophia, Sara, Samuel Jr., and Hannah Louisa. There is no record of a daughter named Phoebe. Since the 1790 U.S. Census describes Samuel Fraunces as a "free white male" and a slaveholder, it is possible that Phoebe was his enslaved servant, rather than his daughter.
Phoebe Fraunces