Anything can be better or worse depending on what criteria you use. With culture, one that maximises well being through equality, justice, progress, practicality etc. would be superior to a culture that runs counter to such values and methods. So yes, a culture can be superior though it depends on what one values. To say that such judgements are elitist is to say you don't value anything.
If a certain folk culture liked a certain type of folk music. And then the general population started listening to it then it would be popular culture, because then the general population is listening and using folk culture.
Evaluate the benefits of a no blame culture
Britain was the main colonizer of Australia, starting with the penal colonies it established on the coast. British colonizers wiped out much of the Aboriginal culture and killed many of the Aboriginals, replacing their culture with British culture. As a result, the Aboriginal cultures are less prominent than they had been historically, and most Australians use a version of British language, law, and ideals.
The ancient Egyptian culture began around 3150BC. The ancient Egyptian culture then ended in 31BC.
yess
Yes they did.
teepees
buffalo skin , sticks
No. The plains tribes did and Hopi were not a plains tribe.
No, teepees were not used by the Aztecs. Teepees were typically associated with Native American tribes from the Great Plains region, while the Aztecs were a Mesoamerican civilization known for their stone temples and pyramids. The Aztecs lived in large cities and built elaborate structures using stone and adobe.
For food and other items.they used their skin for teepees
no not at all only certain tribes did
does the northwest tribe live in teepees
they used the buffalo skin to make teepees that is there houses they live in.
The comanches used buffalo skin and wooden poles for their teepees.
teepees are cone shaped and lodges are like a igloo