0
The partition of Bengal aroused fury among the Hindus. The Hindus thought that the partition of Bengal was an attempt to break the unity among the Hindus which might be a threat to the British Government. They thought that the British had applied their 'Divide and Rule Policy' meaning that the Hindus and the Muslims will keep on fighting with each other and the threat which the radical nationalism of the Hindus was disturbing the Britishers would come to an end. Consequently the Hindus' attempts to kick the British out of the Sub-continent and establish Hindu Rule would loose their solidarity and strength. Furthermore the Hindus could not bear to see the Muslims flourish and the partition of Bengal meant exactly that. It can also be seen that the Hindus wouldn't allow any degree of Partition of their Motherland, the India. This fact was confirmed by the height of opposition and objection to the Partition of India in 1947 from the Hindus.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Beau
Ross
Fran
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who did the public react to flappers?
The elders thought that they were a disgrace . They went against all the morals and they thought that the flappers were too revealing.
How did the peasants react to the economic problems in China during the 19th Century?
The peasants reacted to the economic problems in China during the 19th century through the Yellow Turban Rebellion against Emperor Lingdi.
Why did Louis XVI react so violently against the 3rd estate?
He didn't react violent at all. As a matter of fact he reacted very apathically. The third estate wanted to overtrow the monarchy (thus, Louis XVI as their king), and since he was an execellent king, he was also a weak one. He did not resist. The only thing he did do, was try to flee the country, but he was captured.
How did the Scandinavian rulers react to Lutheranism?
Go suck a w.e.i.n.e.r
How did Germany react to the end of World War 2?
annoyed and embarrassed
