0
Why did you suppose some of Rome's citizens wanted absolute rulers instead of elected senators?
Well, maybe some of Rome's citizens were looking for stability and strong leadership during uncertain times. They might have felt that elected senators were too divided or ineffective in dealing with the challenges Rome was facing. It's important to understand that different people have different perspectives and needs, and it's okay to seek out what feels right for you.
What else can I help you with?
How did the National Assembly reorganize the church?
The Civil Constitution of the Clergy forced the clergy to take an oath to the National Assembly instead of to Rome, and it required that priests be elected. This action alienated the clergy from the Revolution and infuriated the king.
What were the weaknesses of the French Monarchy?
It was an absolute monarchy and therefore lacked the advice and consent of the governed. The entire government was built on the outmoded concept that certain groups had special rights and privilege as an accident of birth instead of their own merit.It also gave the power to the person only to rich people
How were colonies governed before 1763?
Britain's harsh tax and trade policies of the 1760s fanned resentment in the colonies. After 1760s Parliament passed the Stamp Act of 1765 which required the use of tax stamps on all legal documents.
Where did cabral explore?
He meant to explore India, but instead wandered west and explored Brazil
Leg was thought to be rude in Victorian times what word do they use instead of leg?
limb
Why did some of romes citizens want absolute rulers instead of elected senators?
In Ancient Rome, some citizens preferred absolute rulers over the more complicated process involved elected officials (including senators) for several interconnected reasons. First, the value of a single good ruler with the power to enforce beneficial policies was both recognized and desired. Second, the all-too-frequent duplicity involved in election processes, along with the fact that corruption in a complex electoral political setting is more difficult to confront and correct, was also recognized -- and feared.
Why do you suppose some of the Rome's citizens wanted absolute rulers instead of elected senators?
Some citizens of Rome may have preferred absolute rulers over elected senators due to the desire for stability and decisive leadership during times of crisis or political turmoil. They may have viewed absolute rulers as more capable of swiftly addressing issues without the delays and compromises often associated with the senatorial system. Additionally, the allure of strong, charismatic leaders who promised to restore order and prosperity could have appealed to those disillusioned with the inefficacies of the Senate. This preference for autocratic rule reflected a longing for security and effective governance amidst uncertainty.
Why did rome want absolute leaders instead of elected seneters?
Basically the Romans tolerated absolute leaders such as the emperors because they were tired of the civil wars that characterized the final years of the republic. They thought the authority of one man could reign in the various factions competing for power with their armies. The Roman senators were not elected the way our senators are elected today. A man could become a senator by being elected to the office of Quaestor. That was the only way a senator was "elected". Other men were appointed to the senate.
How many Canadian senators are elected to their office?
Canadian senators are appointed by the Prime Minister, they are not elected (although there are plans to reform the Senate).
Was every class represented in the roman republic?
The Romans did not have a representative democracy. People did not elect representatives like congressmen, senators, or MPs. They elected the executive officers of state instead. All adult male Roman citizens had the right to vote.
How did the seventeenth amendment broaden constitutional provision for democratic representation?
The Seventeenth Amendment now said that the people can vote for senators instead of them being elected by the state. In a democracy, it's for the rights of the people and people can now elect their own senators.
Who used to elect senators?
No. The Constitution established in 1787 that the State Legislatures would appoint the Senators. It was not until the 17th Amendment, ratified in 1913, that senators would be elected directly by the people.
Was every class reprsented in the roman republic?
The Romans did not have a representative democracy. People did not elect representatives like congressmen, senators, or MPs. They elected the executive officers of state instead. All adult male Roman citizens had the right to vote.
What were the provisions of the 17th amendment?
The 17th amendment says that senators have to be elected by the people, instead of appointed by the government. A candidate must win the popular vote.
Did the 17 amendment extend voting or change the electoral process?
The 17th Amendment, ratified in 1913, changed the electoral process by allowing for the direct election of Senators. Prior to this amendment, Senators were chosen by state legislatures. The 17th Amendment extended voting rights by giving citizens the power to directly elect their Senators, instead of indirectly through state legislatures.
Who does the sheriff of a county report to?
== == In Texas, the County Sheriff is an elected position and as such does not "report to" any superior, but is instead responsible to the citizens he is sworn to serve.
What did the 17th amendment propose?
The 17th Amendment took the voice of the states away by allowing Senators to be elected by popular vote instead f by the state Legislatures.
