0
Modern monarchs live in extreme luxury, have very in the way of duties or responsibilities and they hold their position their entire lives, whereas prime ministers must work hard for their money and have to keep up with the fickle public's opinion or be ousted.
I think I'd prefer to be monarch. As long as I'm the one who gets to be king, its the perfect system.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Coach
Lao
FranThe monarch is head of state, so they technically have the higher position. Many monarchs do not get directly involved in the day to day running of a country and it is the role of the prime minister to do that. So in that way, they exercise more power, though they are still answerable to the monarch.
The monarch is head of state, so they technically have the higher position. Many monarchs do not get directly involved in the day to day running of a country and it is the role of the prime minister to do that. So in that way, they exercise more power, though they are still answerable to the monarch.
The monarch is head of state, so they technically have the higher position. Many monarchs do not get directly involved in the day to day running of a country and it is the role of the prime minister to do that. So in that way, they exercise more power, though they are still answerable to the monarch.
The monarch is head of state, so they technically have the higher position. Many monarchs do not get directly involved in the day to day running of a country and it is the role of the prime minister to do that. So in that way, they exercise more power, though they are still answerable to the monarch.
The monarch is head of state, so they technically have the higher position. Many monarchs do not get directly involved in the day to day running of a country and it is the role of the prime minister to do that. So in that way, they exercise more power, though they are still answerable to the monarch.
The monarch is head of state, so they technically have the higher position. Many monarchs do not get directly involved in the day to day running of a country and it is the role of the prime minister to do that. So in that way, they exercise more power, though they are still answerable to the monarch.
The monarch is head of state, so they technically have the higher position. Many monarchs do not get directly involved in the day to day running of a country and it is the role of the prime minister to do that. So in that way, they exercise more power, though they are still answerable to the monarch.
The monarch is head of state, so they technically have the higher position. Many monarchs do not get directly involved in the day to day running of a country and it is the role of the prime minister to do that. So in that way, they exercise more power, though they are still answerable to the monarch.
The monarch is head of state, so they technically have the higher position. Many monarchs do not get directly involved in the day to day running of a country and it is the role of the prime minister to do that. So in that way, they exercise more power, though they are still answerable to the monarch.
The monarch is head of state, so they technically have the higher position. Many monarchs do not get directly involved in the day to day running of a country and it is the role of the prime minister to do that. So in that way, they exercise more power, though they are still answerable to the monarch.
The monarch is head of state, so they technically have the higher position. Many monarchs do not get directly involved in the day to day running of a country and it is the role of the prime minister to do that. So in that way, they exercise more power, though they are still answerable to the monarch.
The monarch is head of state, so they technically have the higher position. Many monarchs do not get directly involved in the day to day running of a country and it is the role of the prime minister to do that. So in that way, they exercise more power, though they are still answerable to the monarch.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who was leader of Great Britain in ww1?
Prime Minister Asquith followed by David Lloyd GeorgeKing George V was the monarch
What are the qualifications for prime minister?
a good prime minister needs to make good desicions a nice person have initiative respect and all those things. also good prime minsters actually keep their promises in which they made and try and make their country a better place which will benefit all the people in country
Who was the leader of England in 1962?
The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom in 1962 was Harold Macmillan (Con) The monarch was HM Queen Elizabeth II.
Which Prime Minister from Saskatchewan is responsible for the Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
Saskatchewan's John Diefenbaker, Canada's Prime Minister from 1957 to 1963, was responsible for the Bill of Rights, which turned out to be a rather toothless piece of legislation. Pierre Elliot Trudeau is the Prime Minister responsible for the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which is enshrined in Canada's Constitution.
Who was the first Prime Minister of Newfoundland and Labrador?
The Prime Minister of Newfoundland is the Prime Minister of Canada, currently Stephen Harper of the Conservative Party.The actual post Prime Minister of Newfoundland was abolished in 1934.
