0
The ruling opened the door for anything that held serious political, artistic, literary, orscientific value. In other words, just about anything goes when it comes to the definition of "obscenity." Essentially, someone, somewhere, will find value in the "art" work. Search the web for a view of "PissChrist" - you'll find the most blasphemous, disgusting representation of Jesus ever crafted, and yet, under Miller, this is completely acceptable, though not illegal. A generous debate upon government censorship, and its role within the private sector is certainly in order. Once again, we Americans are faced with rights in conflict - your right to free expression vs my right to be free from your expressions.
Many decisions have for the good. Brown v Board of Education gave African American children equal education by intergration. Rulings using the 14th amendment concerning reasonable doubt and rulings on the 4th and 5th amendment concerning the exclusionary clause in Mapp v Ohio. Voting is another area and the reading of rights when arrested are other rulings.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Federal ruling system is more democratic and inclusive than unitary ruling system in 4 points?
Federal ruling systems are more democratic and inclusive than unitary ruling systems because the government remains close to its people, encourages devolution of government resources, and bars dominance of the majority.
What is the function of ruling party?
ruling party like house keeper ,ruling party decide the foreign policy with the help of apposition party and communicate with other country to improve trade and laible to every decision that take in parliament and responsible for every welfare policy implication ruling party make budget
What did the brown ruling declare?
The Brown ruling declared by Chief Justice Earl Warren, "separate but equal is inherently unequal," when declaring segregation unconstitutional.
What is established by the court ruling of an earlier case?
Precedent
What is a ruling authority for a community?
hey its government.
How did France Vietnam?
They affected them by ruling as the colonial power.
How might a Chinese emperors leadership be affected by living in the forbidden city?
By the ruling
How might a Chinese emperors leadership be affected by living in a forbidden city?
By the ruling
What is the legal interpretation of obscenity based on?
U.S. obscenity law is based on the Miller Test that was established by the 1973 Supreme Court ruling in Miller v. California. The three parts of the Miller Test are: whether the average person, in an average setting, would find the work sexual in nature; whether the work demonstrates blatantly offensive sexual behavior as defined by law; and whether the work lacks any redeeming value on any level.
How did this ruling alter behavior within US society legal scholars were targeted of investigation during national crises?
civil liberties were subject to interpretation during national crisis
In the state of California is a separated spouse entitled to any money?
It depends on the court's ruling.
How was southeast Asia affected socially culturally nationally by imperialism?
2nd religion, 2nd language, exposure to the culture ruling over it.
What happened to California's proposition187?
California's Proposition 187 was found to be unconstitutional when it was challenged in federal court. Governor Davis stopped all state appeals against the ruling.
How did the US expansion to California affect most Mexican ruling class?
They lost their land and became migrant workers.
How do you get a misdemeanor expunged in California?
File a petition/motion containing the reason for the request with the court. A judge will consider it, and issue a ruling either granting it, or denying it.
What problem in 1990s affected the ability of some Cuban children to get an education?
Because over in Cuba Spain was ruling Cuba and it was hard for the Cuban to fight for their rights because of dictator
Which supreme court case established the plain view doctrine?
Coolidge v. New Hampshire in 1977 was the first ruling on the plain view doctrine. It has since been updated in 1987 in the ruling Arizona v. Hicks and again in 1990 with Horton v. California.
