proportional
In the British ruled colonies, Britain had a polcy of Parlaimentary virtual representation, which meant that the colonies were represented through someone living in Britain based on a particular commonatily. For example: All shoemakers in colonial new England were virtually represented by a British showmaker. The colonists were angered at the Mother countries policy of virtual representation because they were forced to pay taxes withour being actually represented in Parlaiment. The colonist marched through the streets shouting "no taxation without representation!". Tis is the main difference between the two. I hope this helps.
He believed that the national legislature should have two houses. In the lower house , states should be represented based on their population. In the upper house, each state should have one vote, he believed that slaves should be counted equally with other people in determining a states representation in the national legislature, he believed that the executive should be elected by the national legislature
new jersey plan
As of June 2009, you must be referenced by somebody they represent in order for them to consider you for new talent representation.
Each member of Parliament virtually represented all the citizens
In 2005, the British House of Commons was represented by 646 constituencies. Each constituency elected one Member of Parliament (MP) to represent it. This structure has been a key feature of the UK's parliamentary system, allowing for local representation in the national legislature.
New Zealand and Australia are classified as parliamentary democracies rather than democratic republics because their political systems are based on the Westminster model, which emphasizes a parliamentary structure and a constitutional monarchy. In both countries, the head of state is a monarch (the British monarch), represented locally by a governor-general, while the head of government is the prime minister. This system contrasts with a democratic republic, where the head of state is typically elected and holds a more prominent role in governance. Thus, their constitutional frameworks and historical ties to the British monarchy define their classification as parliamentary democracies.
I assume you are referring to how the states are represented in the federal legislature. The small states wanted equal representation; that is, they wanted all states, regardless of population size, to have the same number of votes in the congress. The large states argued in favor of proportional representation, where votes would be apportioned by the size of the population. The compromise was, of course, to have a bicameral legislature, one with two houses, one having proportional representation, the other having equal representation.
Estimates Committee
The group that believed the colonists were adequately represented in Parliament was the Loyalists, or Tories. They argued that the colonists had virtual representation, meaning that Parliament represented the interests of all British subjects, regardless of their geographic location. Loyalists maintained that the interests of the colonies were considered in parliamentary decisions, and thus, they opposed the idea of direct representation. This belief contributed to their support for British governance during the American Revolution.
T. C. Mossom Meekins has written: 'Parliamentary reform, should the colonies be represented?' -- subject(s): Politics and government, Colonies, Administration, Representative government and representation
In the British ruled colonies, Britain had a polcy of Parlaimentary virtual representation, which meant that the colonies were represented through someone living in Britain based on a particular commonatily. For example: All shoemakers in colonial new England were virtually represented by a British showmaker. The colonists were angered at the Mother countries policy of virtual representation because they were forced to pay taxes withour being actually represented in Parlaiment. The colonist marched through the streets shouting "no taxation without representation!". Tis is the main difference between the two. I hope this helps.
The House is over-represented but essentially a volunteer, citizen legislature with 400 members.
In demographic representation, the characteristics of a legislature are quite similar to the characteristics of people they represent. Although US Congress is not demographically represented, it has moved closer to such representation by inducting more and more women members in recent years. In agency representation, constituents elect a representative and then monitor his performance through the term. If they feel unsatisfied of his performance they discard him and elect another member in next elections.
A pro of a parliamentary democracy is that it is representative of the will of the people. A con is that it can be difficult to get bills passed because of the varied opinions represented.
A pro of a parliamentary democracy is that it is representative of the will of the people. A con is that it can be difficult to get bills passed because of the varied opinions represented.
Women and Latinos