Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. The statement "There should be no minimum voting age" is definitely arguable, like, come on, people can argue about anything these days. But is it defensible? Well, that's a whole other story. So, the answer is D) It is arguable but not defensible. Like, you can argue it all day long, but defending it might be a bit tricky.
B) it is both arguable and defensible. Just like pineapple on Pizza, some people will argue for it and some will argue against it. But hey, at the end of the day, you do you, boo.
Christopher Gadsden
You can approve a cardholder statement from the transaction list.
We don’t have the statement so can’t answer.
find a counterexample to the statement all us presidents have served only one term to show statement is false
The Declaration of Independence could be described in may ways. There is no "best" one.It was a statement of American existenceIt was a statement of American identityIt was, and still is a statement of American hope for the country and for the people.And, of course, it can be described as a statement of American independence - the very reason for the existence of the document.
It is both arguable and defensible.
A defensible thesis is a statement that can be supported with evidence and reasoning. It should be clear, specific, and arguable to encourage critical thinking and discussion. Adequate research and analysis are required to back up a defensible thesis.
Many, many products claim to be number one, preferred, best, most loved, most powerful, most popular, etc. The ability of companies to advertise products this way has been tested in courts in the United States and elsewhere. When the statement is a matter of opinion, personal taste, or judgement, a certain amount of hyperbole is accepted. When the statement makes a very specific, verifiable claim about a product ("#1 selling truck four years in a row" or "proven to cure diabetes permanently") that statement must be defensible. Sometimes the statement that a product is number one will have an explanation or limitation presented when the statement is made ("#1 selling fuel efficient car*" might have "*of all American four-door four-cylinder gasoline engine cars in 2008" elsewhere on the page).
A contradiction of a statement is a statement that proves the previous statement wrong.
The singular possessive form of "statement" is "statement's."
it should contain statement of comprehesive statement, statement of financial position and statement of cashflows
The reverse and negation of an if-then statement is as follows:if (...) then statement;reversed becomesif (not (...)) then statement;
no. income statement is a only a statement in financial statements.
It is a statement. It is a false statement, but a statement nevertheless.
Bank reconciliation statement is not part of financial statement it is the helping statement to tally bank account with balance in banks statement.
If the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then "This statement is false" is true, making the statement false. But if the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then... It's one of the biggest paradoxes ever, just like saying, "I'm lying right now."
Income Statement, Retained Earnings Statement, Statement of Equity, Balance Sheet, and then Statement of Cash Flows.