0
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Search for additional evidence to see which argument it supports.
HUNTER LASSITER
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What do historians do when using the historical thinking skill of chronological thinking?
Answer this questio A historian using the historical thinking skill of chronological thinking might: n…
How can a historian determine whether or not a claim is valid?
modern historians usually try to determine what stories are true and false depending on whether or not there are multiple stories. In the case of the Gospels in the catholic bible, the people who put the bible together decided what went in because of what each story said meaning all 4 Gospels are historically accurate because they pretty much tell the same story (save for a few details) P.s. this my first answer
What is the purpose of analyzing a document?
The main purpose to analyze a document, especially historical documents, is to determine authenticity. Various processes are followed to determine the authenticity of the paper and ink, which is used to date the item.
Which is an initial response governing principle?
Determine and communicate protective measures
How does the Electoral College determine who becomes president?
me
Which term describes a clearly stated argument supporting a particular point of view?
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
How should historians determine which argument is superior if two arguments about an historical event contradict each other?
Historians should assess the evidence supporting each argument, consider the credibility of the sources, and evaluate the context in which the arguments were made. They may also look for consensus among other historians or seek additional evidence to support one argument over the other. Ultimately, the argument that is best supported by a preponderance of evidence and critical analysis is considered superior.
What term describes a clearly stated argument supporting a particular point of view?
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
How should historians determine which argument is superior?
Historians determine the superiority of arguments based on evidence, logical reasoning, and adherence to historical context. Arguments that are supported by primary sources, are coherent and well-reasoned, and accurately reflect the historical context are typically considered superior. It is also important to consider counterarguments and alternative perspectives in evaluating the strength of an argument.
Did Pythagoras have any brothers or sisters?
There is no reliable historical record that allows historians to determine whether or not Pythagoras had any siblings.
What are the 5 criteria for historical reliability?
The five criteria for historical reliability are multiple independent sources, early sources, eyewitness accounts, archaeological evidence, and external corroboration. These criteria help historians assess the accuracy and trustworthiness of historical information.
What do historians do when using the historical thinking of chronological thinking?
Answer this questio A historian using the historical thinking skill of chronological thinking might: n…
Which historical thinking skill is the historian using?
The historian is likely using the skill of sourcing, which involves examining the origin of information to determine its credibility and relevance to the historical narrative. By identifying the sources of historical information, historians can better evaluate the context and perspective from which the information is presented.
What do historians do when using the historical thinking skills of evaluating interpretations?
Answer this question… Analyze the work of other historians to draw conclusions
Ask us of the following arguments is an argument of consequence?
Can you provide the arguments so that I can determine if it is an argument of consequence?
To determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable historians generally?
Answer this question… check to see if the information in the source is confirmed by other sources.
Why is it harder for a historian to use sources than for a detective?
Historians often deal with incomplete, biased, or conflicting sources, making it challenging to piece together an accurate narrative. Unlike detectives who may have access to physical evidence, historians must interpret and analyze historical documents to construct their understanding of the past. Additionally, historical sources may be limited by the perspectives or agendas of their creators, requiring historians to critically evaluate their reliability.
