0
To determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable historians generally?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Answer this question…
check to see if the information in the source is confirmed by other sources.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are both techniques historians use when synthesizing evidence?
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
Why is it important for historians to corroborate the information found in pieces of historical evidence?
Answer this question… Different pieces of evidence may contradict the original information.
Which is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history?
Corroborated sources of historical evidence. (APEX) !/
What Kinds of evidence will historians of the future study to learn about your culture?
i think, they will study what we did in life
Why do historians look for evidence about the distant past in myths and legend?
Historians look for evidence about the distant past in myths and legends because myths and legends tell what people believed and understood. Historians study by looking at journals, data, diaries etc., to learn information.
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
Search for additional evidence to see which argument it supports.
What are techniques historians use when synthesizing evidence?
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
Which method separates modern historians from ancient Greek historians?
Basing historical accounts on reliable evidence
Which historical term describes the specific primary and secondary sources that historians use to support their claims?
Historical evidence.
What are both techniques historians use when synthesizing evidence?
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
How can historians determine whether a claim is valid?
evaluate the evidence used to support it
What step must a historian take to evaluate historical evidence?
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
Why historians use historical thinking skills?
To find answers to questions about the past using evidence
What best describes why historians use historical thinking skills?
To find answers to questions about the past using evidence.
Can a historian determine whether or not a claim is valid?
Check to see that it is supported by historical evidence.
How should historians determine which argument is superior?
Historians determine the superiority of arguments based on evidence, logical reasoning, and adherence to historical context. Arguments that are supported by primary sources, are coherent and well-reasoned, and accurately reflect the historical context are typically considered superior. It is also important to consider counterarguments and alternative perspectives in evaluating the strength of an argument.
Did Robin Hood exsist?
Maybe. Historians have traced him back to 1226 to when oral stories were told in rhyme, but there is no true historical evidence he really existed.
