answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Answer this question…

check to see if the information in the source is confirmed by other sources.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Marques Sneed

Lvl 3
8mo ago

evaluating the degree to which bias affects its conclusions (Apex)

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

mari_fer83

Lvl 4
2y ago

jhvhvghjvbnv

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: To determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable historians generally?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?

Search for additional evidence to see which argument it supports.


What are techniques historians use when synthesizing evidence?

Comparing and contrasting historical sources


Which method separates modern historians from ancient Greek historians?

Basing historical accounts on reliable evidence


Which historical term describes the specific primary and secondary sources that historians use to support their claims?

Historical evidence.


What are both techniques historians use when synthesizing evidence?

Comparing and contrasting historical sources


How can historians determine whether a claim is valid?

evaluate the evidence used to support it


What step must a historian take to evaluate historical evidence?

The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.


Why historians use historical thinking skills?

To find answers to questions about the past using evidence


What best describes why historians use historical thinking skills?

To find answers to questions about the past using evidence.


Can a historian determine whether or not a claim is valid?

Check to see that it is supported by historical evidence.


How should historians determine which argument is superior?

I have the feeling that your question may be part of a series of questions that were put to you. So there is a risk in giving an answer out of the context of your homework assignment. But generally speaking, the strongest argument in any historical debate will be the one where facts and assumed motives can be supported by contemporary factual and documentary evidence; the more, the better.


Did Robin Hood exsist?

Maybe. Historians have traced him back to 1226 to when oral stories were told in rhyme, but there is no true historical evidence he really existed.