The Founding Fathers adopted some then-novel theories of government, which had actually been around since the Athenian city-state of Ancient Greece. Rather than being a hereditary power handed down among powerful families (divine right of kings), philosophers such as john Locke saw government as a shared agreement among peoples of a nation (social contract). Locke said as much in his Essay concerning Human Understanding (circa 1690).
The phrase "consent of the governed" in the Declaration of Independence is used to support the contention that a government can fail to be responsive to those it governs, often because it equates governing with absolute rule.
People are the source of all government power.
"Consent of the governed" is a political theory stating that a government's legitimacy and moral right to use state power is, or ought to be, derived from the people or society over which that power is exercised. This theory of "consent" is historically contrasted to the divine right of kings and has often been invoked against the legitimacy of colonialism. Following John Locke's notion of a nation of "free and equal" citizens, the Founders of the United States believed that consent of the governed was the only legitimate basis upon which one "free and equal" citizen could exercise legal authority over another -- otherwise neither equal could overcome the other.
The government receives its authority to act from the people.
Filters of Consent has to do with the electoral college. Filters of consent just means that someone or something has to go through many steps and different groups to be passed, or approved.
what does state government mean please answer it for me
People are the source of all government power.
The consent of the governed and the social contract are both philosophies by John Locke. They state that a government's citizens agree to give up some of their personal freedoms for their protection by the government.
"Consent of the governed" is a political theory stating that a government's legitimacy and moral right to use state power is, or ought to be, derived from the people or society over which that power is exercised. This theory of "consent" is historically contrasted to the divine right of kings and has often been invoked against the legitimacy of colonialism. Following John Locke's notion of a nation of "free and equal" citizens, the Founders of the United States believed that consent of the governed was the only legitimate basis upon which one "free and equal" citizen could exercise legal authority over another -- otherwise neither equal could overcome the other.
An independent republic is a form of government where the country is governed by elected officials and the ultimate authority lies with the people. It is independent in that it is not governed by a foreign power or monarch.
The government receives its authority to act from the people.
If you mean the magnetic poles, then none. The northern and southern poles of the Earth do not exist within the boundaries of any governed nations.
nothing
If you mean camps run by the Armenian government the answer is none.
Consent is a noun (the consent) and a verb (to consent).
If democracy is what you mean, it is a form of government. The United States, for example, is a democracy. A democracy is the belief that the the government is run by "the people". In order for a nation to be considered a democracy, it must have a voting system.
Revolution means to completely and forcibly overturn and replace an established government or political system by the people governed. A massive revolutionary would be on a global scale.
I think you mean rule of law. The rule of law is the legal principle that law should govern a nation, as opposed to being governed by random decisions of individual government officials.