it is where the constitution is protected through it's own laws and regulations. For some countries, there must be a certain amount of public support as well as support from a certain number of members of the government. E.g. In America, to change the constitution, the government must have a majority of it's members must agree as well as 2/3s of the states must agree in order to change a part of their constitution. In the UK, entrenchment doesn't exist. Parliament could change the constitution as they please as they are sovereign (the ultimate power in the UK), although government can change the constitution as much as they can (needing an overall majority within government) parliament still have the last word of the matter. There is no need for entrenchment in the UK as it uses an uncodified constitution and therefore a majority of the constitution isn't written on a document, but can easily be changed by the government or parliament (but is unlikely without consulting the public via a referendum as this could lead to considered Dictatorship and could threaten democracy and the people would not like this and would protest).
No. Nowhere in the constitution is "freedom of rights" mentioned
The Constitution itself was ratified in 1787. The Bill of Rights, the 1st ten amendments to the Constitution, was added to the Constitution in 1789.
no because one of the amendments are "all rights not stated in the constitution are hereby given to the states or the people"
It protected the citizens rights.
The bill of rights (first 10 amendments) were part of the constitution when it was ratified
Civil Rights or Liberties.
To entrench with stability or not
The Bill of Rights are the first 10 amendments made to the Constitution. They explained the colonists rights.
The US constitution confers no rights to Americans as citizens. It does however, do so for US citizens.
-verb (used with object)1.to place in a position of strength; establish firmly or solidly: safely entrenched behind undeniable facts.2.to dig trenches for defensive purposes around (oneself, a military position, etc.).-verb (used without object)3.to encroach; trespass; infringe (usually fol. by on or upon): to entrench on the domain or rights of another.
the enumeration in the constitution, of certin rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparge others retained by the peolpe
If you mean the Anti-federalists, then the Bill of Rights.
If you mean the Anti-federalists, then the Bill of Rights.
If you mean the Anti-federalists, then the Bill of Rights.
Constitution Constitution bill of rights
Bill of Rights
he believd that the constitution did not protect peoples rights as so the Bill of Rights did