it is where the constitution is protected through it's own laws and regulations. For some countries, there must be a certain amount of public support as well as support from a certain number of members of the government. E.g. In America, to change the constitution, the government must have a majority of it's members must agree as well as 2/3s of the states must agree in order to change a part of their constitution. In the UK, entrenchment doesn't exist. Parliament could change the constitution as they please as they are sovereign (the ultimate power in the UK), although government can change the constitution as much as they can (needing an overall majority within government) parliament still have the last word of the matter. There is no need for entrenchment in the UK as it uses an uncodified constitution and therefore a majority of the constitution isn't written on a document, but can easily be changed by the government or parliament (but is unlikely without consulting the public via a referendum as this could lead to considered Dictatorship and could threaten democracy and the people would not like this and would protest).
no because one of the amendments are "all rights not stated in the constitution are hereby given to the states or the people"
No. Nowhere in the constitution is "freedom of rights" mentioned
The Constitution itself was ratified in 1787. The Bill of Rights, the 1st ten amendments to the Constitution, was added to the Constitution in 1789.
There is 5 essential characteristics of federal constitution. 1. Division and distribution of powers. 2. Supremacy of constitution 3. A written constitution 4. Rigidity 5. Authority of courts
It protected the citizens rights.
Civil Rights or Liberties.
To entrench with stability or not
The Bill of Rights are the first 10 amendments made to the Constitution. They explained the colonists rights.
The Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that the enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution does not mean that others do not exist. It emphasizes that the rights of the people are not limited to just those explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, ensuring that unenumerated rights are also protected from denial or infringement.
The US constitution confers no rights to Americans as citizens. It does however, do so for US citizens.
the enumeration in the constitution, of certin rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparge others retained by the peolpe
If you mean the Anti-federalists, then the Bill of Rights.
If you mean the Anti-federalists, then the Bill of Rights.
If you mean the Anti-federalists, then the Bill of Rights.
The Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that the enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution does not mean that people do not have other rights that are not specifically mentioned. This amendment emphasizes that individuals possess additional rights beyond those explicitly listed, protecting the rights and freedoms of the people from being limited solely to those enumerated in the Constitution.
Constitution Constitution bill of rights
Bill of Rights