answersLogoWhite

0

Public speech that threaten the public peace and order. Numerous state and local laws prohibit incitement to riot and disturbing the peace.

Criminal Law and Procedure

John M. Scheb, 2010

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about American Government

What are the three types of speech protected by the first amendment?

The 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution enumerates five forms of protected speech. Among these are the right to petition, assemble and the press.


Is freedom of association part of the US Constitution?

Freedom of Association is an implicit right granted by the United States Constitution's Bill of Rights. It can be derived from the 1st and 2nd Amendment protections of speech, religion, assembly, redress, bearing of arms, and maintaining a regulated civilian militia. Each of these 1st and 2nd Amendment enumerated rights are forms of association by definition and thus protected.


Which statement best summarizes why the government sometimes places limits on the First Amendment right to freedom of speech?

some forms of speech can directly harm other citizens or put them in danger


What was Oliver Wendell Holmes' opinion in Schenck v US?

The Court's decision in Schenck v. United States, (1919) placed a limitation (called an exception) on constitutional First Amendment rights to freedom of speech or expression.Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., writing the opinion of the Court, held that First Amendment protection did not extend to circumstances where exercise of speech created a "clear and present danger." This is also the case that used the example of "shouting 'fire' in a crowded theater."The exact quote is: "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic."Holmes point was that there is no absolute right of free speech, because there are always circumstances in which unregulated expression can create problematic or dangerous situations. The need for safeguarding the public (or, in the case of Schenck, the government) against certain forms of speech creates exceptions that are not protected by the First Amendment. "Falsely shouting fire in a theatre" is an example illustrating Holmes' point.Another quote from Schenck that further clarifies the Court's position: "Words which, ordinarily and in many places, would be within the freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment may become subject to prohibition when of such a nature and used in such circumstances a to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils which Congress has a right to prevent. The character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done."Holmes concluded the intent of the pamphlet Charles Schenck distributed was to influence drafted men to resist enlistment, which would obstruct the government's war effort. Holmes acknowledged the circular would have been protected under the First Amendment during peace time, but that the United States' engagement with Germany in war changed the context.Case Citation:Schenck v. United States, 249 US 47 (1919)


What expanded Americans conceptions of liberty to include some forms of freedom from discrimination?

fourteenth amendment

Related Questions

Are corporations protected by the First Amendment?

Yes, corporations are protected by the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech, including for businesses and other organizations. This protection allows corporations to engage in political speech, advertising, and other forms of expression.


Which amendment is flag desecration in?

Flag desecration is primarily associated with the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects the freedom of speech and expression. The Supreme Court has ruled that flag burning and other forms of flag desecration are forms of symbolic speech, thus protected under this amendment. However, various legislative attempts have been made to prohibit flag desecration, but as of now, no amendment has successfully passed to limit this expression.


What are the three types of speech protected by the first amendment?

The 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution enumerates five forms of protected speech. Among these are the right to petition, assemble and the press.


Each of these activities is protected by the constitutional right to free expression except what?

Each of these activities is protected by the constitutional right to free expression except for actions that incite violence, constitute hate speech, or involve true threats. The First Amendment does not protect speech that leads to imminent lawless action or poses a clear and present danger. Additionally, certain forms of obscenity and defamation are not protected under free expression rights.


What is the distinction between protected speech and unprotected speech under the law?

Protected speech refers to forms of expression that are safeguarded by the First Amendment, such as opinions, beliefs, and political statements. Unprotected speech, on the other hand, includes categories like obscenity, incitement to violence, and defamation, which are not shielded by the law and can be subject to legal restrictions.


Are emails freedom of speech?

Like written or spoken speech, your words in email are protected by the first amendment. Just like other forms of speech, certain types of statements are not protected, such as threats.


What was the original purpose of the First Amendment, and how has it evolved over time?

The original purpose of the First Amendment was to protect freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition. Over time, the interpretation and application of the First Amendment have expanded to include new forms of expression and protect individuals' rights in various contexts, such as in the digital age and in relation to hate speech and national security concerns.


What is the meaning of symbolic speech?

Symbolic speech refers to nonverbal forms of expression that convey a message or opinion, such as wearing a t-shirt with a political slogan or burning the flag as a form of protest. This type of speech is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.


Discuss why the first amendment has not been applied in a literal fashion to bar all forms of government interference with self-expression regardless of the circumstances?

The First Amendment has not been applied literally to bar all forms of government interference with self-expression because the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that certain limitations are necessary to balance individual rights with societal interests. For instance, restrictions exist to prevent hate speech, obscenity, and incitement to violence, which can harm public order or individuals. Additionally, the government has a legitimate interest in regulating certain forms of expression, such as commercial speech and time, place, and manner restrictions, to maintain public safety and welfare. Therefore, the application of the First Amendment is context-dependent, allowing for nuanced interpretations that reflect the complexities of governance and social order.


A demonstrator carries a sign that features a logo expressing disagreement with a government policy the demonstrators sign is an example of what kind of protected speech?

The sign carried by the demonstrator is an example of symbolic speech, which is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Symbolic speech includes using non-verbal forms, such as signs, gestures, or actions, to convey a message or express an opinion. As long as it does not incite violence or create a clear and imminent danger, symbolic speech is generally protected as a form of expression.


What protects forms of expression other than spoken words?

first amendments freedoms


Is censorship legal in the US?

Not all forms of censorship are illegal. When private individuals agitate to eliminate TV programs they dislike, or threaten to boycott the companies that support those programs with advertising dollars, they are certainly trying to censor artistic expression and interfere with the free speech of others. But their actions are perfectly legal; in fact, their protests are protected by the First Amendment right to freedom of speech. ---- Refer to related link.