answersLogoWhite

0

Public speech that threaten the public peace and order. Numerous state and local laws prohibit incitement to riot and disturbing the peace.

Criminal Law and Procedure

John M. Scheb, 2010

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

MaxineMaxine
I respect you enough to keep it real.
Chat with Maxine
LaoLao
The path is yours to walk; I am only here to hold up a mirror.
Chat with Lao
RafaRafa
There's no fun in playing it safe. Why not try something a little unhinged?
Chat with Rafa
More answers

Fighting words is one example. Threats, speech that incites panic like yelling fire in a crowded building, certain types of harassing behavior, certain types of false statements, and fraud are also not covered.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
User Avatar

The First Amendment protects our freedoms of speech, religion, the press, and to assemble or petition government.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What forms of expression is not protected under the first amendment?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

What are the three types of speech protected by the first amendment?

The 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution enumerates five forms of protected speech. Among these are the right to petition, assemble and the press.


Is freedom of association part of the US Constitution?

Freedom of Association is an implicit right granted by the United States Constitution's Bill of Rights. It can be derived from the 1st and 2nd Amendment protections of speech, religion, assembly, redress, bearing of arms, and maintaining a regulated civilian militia. Each of these 1st and 2nd Amendment enumerated rights are forms of association by definition and thus protected.


Which statement best summarizes why the government sometimes places limits on the First Amendment right to freedom of speech?

some forms of speech can directly harm other citizens or put them in danger


What expanded Americans conceptions of liberty to include some forms of freedom from discrimination?

fourteenth amendment


What was Oliver Wendell Holmes' opinion in Schenck v US?

The Court's decision in Schenck v. United States, (1919) placed a limitation (called an exception) on constitutional First Amendment rights to freedom of speech or expression.Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., writing the opinion of the Court, held that First Amendment protection did not extend to circumstances where exercise of speech created a "clear and present danger." This is also the case that used the example of "shouting 'fire' in a crowded theater."The exact quote is: "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic."Holmes point was that there is no absolute right of free speech, because there are always circumstances in which unregulated expression can create problematic or dangerous situations. The need for safeguarding the public (or, in the case of Schenck, the government) against certain forms of speech creates exceptions that are not protected by the First Amendment. "Falsely shouting fire in a theatre" is an example illustrating Holmes' point.Another quote from Schenck that further clarifies the Court's position: "Words which, ordinarily and in many places, would be within the freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment may become subject to prohibition when of such a nature and used in such circumstances a to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils which Congress has a right to prevent. The character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done."Holmes concluded the intent of the pamphlet Charles Schenck distributed was to influence drafted men to resist enlistment, which would obstruct the government's war effort. Holmes acknowledged the circular would have been protected under the First Amendment during peace time, but that the United States' engagement with Germany in war changed the context.Case Citation:Schenck v. United States, 249 US 47 (1919)