0
What else can I help you with?
What do historians call the political social or culture circumstances surroundings an event?
Historical context
What do historians mean when they refer to historical context of an event?
When a historian refers to the historical context of an event they mean that they want you to look at the attitude, conditions and mood of the time of a specific historical event.
What best describes an event's historical context?
The social or political setting in which it occurred
What Sources Did McCullough Rely Upon for 1776?
David McCullough relied on a variety of primary and secondary sources for his book "1776," including letters, diaries, and official documents from key figures of the American Revolutionary War, such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. He also drew upon historical accounts and analyses from historians to provide context and depth to the narrative. By utilizing these sources, McCullough aimed to present a vivid and accessible portrayal of the pivotal year in American history.
Historical context of declaration of independence?
it gave us our independence and the rights we have today in the United States of America
Why historians use historical thinking skills?
Historians use historical thinking skills to critically analyze and interpret past events, identify patterns and trends, provide context to historical events, and make connections between past and present. These skills help historians to form well-supported arguments and conclusions about the significance and impact of historical events.
Why do historians look for evidence?
Historians look for evidence to support their understanding and interpretation of the past. Evidence helps validate their arguments, provide context, and support conclusions about historical events and figures. By examining various forms of evidence, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced understanding of history.
What do historians mean when they refer to the historians context of an event?
When a historian refers to the historical context of an event they mean that they want you to look at the attitude, conditions and mood of the time of a specific historical event.
How do historical thinkers use primary and secondary sources to formulate historical arguments?
Historical thinkers use primary sources, like letters or speeches from time periods being studied, to analyze original perspectives or events. Secondary sources, such as scholarly articles or books, provide context or interpretations of primary sources to help construct arguments. By triangulating information from both types of sources, historians can formulate well-rounded and evidence-based historical arguments.
What do historians call the political social or cultural surroundings an event?
Historical context
What do historians call the political or cultural circumstances surrounding an event?
Historical context
What do historians mean when they refer historical context of an event?
the circumstances surrounding the event
What do historians call political social or cultural circumstances surrounding an event?
Historical context
What do historians call the political social or cultural circumstances surrounding event?
Historical context
How should historians determine which argument is superior if two arguments about an historical event contradict each other?
Historians should assess the evidence supporting each argument, consider the credibility of the sources, and evaluate the context in which the arguments were made. They may also look for consensus among other historians or seek additional evidence to support one argument over the other. Ultimately, the argument that is best supported by a preponderance of evidence and critical analysis is considered superior.
Why do historians use the historical thinking skill of interpretation?
To develop a deeper understanding of the past by using sources
How should historians determine which argument is superior?
I have the feeling that your question may be part of a series of questions that were put to you. So there is a risk in giving an answer out of the context of your homework assignment. But generally speaking, the strongest argument in any historical debate will be the one where facts and assumed motives can be supported by contemporary factual and documentary evidence; the more, the better.
