secondary source
i think they are a primary source.... yes it is a primary source
Interpretation.
google.com
When researching American independence or almost any founding-period subject, the Declaration of Independence is indeed a primary source. The difference between primary sources and secondary sources hinges on this simple distinction: a primary source is (or was) "there", while a secondary source is (or was) not "there" but instead talks "about" it.
How could you tell if the a Historical source is tainted with bias of a specitic agenda?
A historical source can be anything. A letter, diary, painting, newspaper, anything.
Hehrh
Primary source documents are documents that are created during the historical period and are written about the historical period. They are often based on observation.
No, it's a primary source historical document.
Historians will examine a second hand source of a historical event. If the second hand source matches up to other sources of information, then each source in a certain manner adds to the credibility of the historical event.
nothing
Isolate the problemCollect source materials, including primary and secondary sourcesEvaluate source materialFormulate hypothesesReport and interpret findings
cultural and historical text
A source directly from an event. An autobiography, Photograph, interview YOU did, are all primary sources.
secondary source
You would consult a primary source for a first and personal view of an historical event. Primary sources are original materials.