answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Google.com

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which is the best source of historical evidence to learn about how an event unfolded?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is a photograph of a riot a primary source?

Yes, a photograph of a riot can be considered a primary source as it provides direct visual evidence of the event. It captures the scene as it unfolded and can serve as an authentic record of the riot.


Do you say the story's event unfold or unfolded?

You would say the story's event unfolded


Which is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history?

Corroborated sources of historical evidence. (APEX) !/


Would letters and diaries of soldiers always be accurate historical evidence?

Yes, because letters and diaries of soldiers would be considered what is called a primary source. A primary source is a document or artefact created at the time of the event. This means that letters and diaries of soldiers would be considered accurate historical evidence.


Is a second hand source reliable?

Historians will examine a second hand source of a historical event. If the second hand source matches up to other sources of information, then each source in a certain manner adds to the credibility of the historical event.


Is The Titanic A Primary or secondary source?

It depends what you are talking about. RMS Titanic is a primary source, as it is the real thing. But books and paintings that were made after the event are secondary sources. Hope this helped :)


Which text is valuable for gaining context about a historical event but is unreliable as evidence?

textbook


What text is valuable for gaining context about a historical event but is unreliable as evidence?

textbook


Why would a researcher uses a primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event?

Answer this question… To evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event


Why would researcher use primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event?

Answer this question… To evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event


What is the primary historical source?

A source directly from an event. An autobiography, Photograph, interview YOU did, are all primary sources.


What is a document that was produced during the same time period as the historical event?

secondary source