secondary source
i think they are a primary source.... yes it is a primary source
An eye-witness account.
check primary and secondary sources related to the event - apex
When a historian refers to the historical context of an event they mean that they want you to look at the attitude, conditions and mood of the time of a specific historical event.
Yes, a photograph of a riot can be considered a primary source as it provides direct visual evidence of the event. It captures the scene as it unfolded and can serve as an authentic record of the riot.
You would say the story's event unfolded
Corroborated sources of historical evidence. (APEX) !/
Yes, because letters and diaries of soldiers would be considered what is called a primary source. A primary source is a document or artefact created at the time of the event. This means that letters and diaries of soldiers would be considered accurate historical evidence.
Historians will examine a second hand source of a historical event. If the second hand source matches up to other sources of information, then each source in a certain manner adds to the credibility of the historical event.
It depends what you are talking about. RMS Titanic is a primary source, as it is the real thing. But books and paintings that were made after the event are secondary sources. Hope this helped :)
textbook
textbook
Answer this question… To evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event
Answer this question… To evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event
A source directly from an event. An autobiography, Photograph, interview YOU did, are all primary sources.
secondary source