answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is a photograph of a riot a primary source?

Yes, a photograph of a riot can be considered a primary source as it provides direct visual evidence of the event. It captures the scene as it unfolded and can serve as an authentic record of the riot.


Do you say the story's event unfold or unfolded?

You would say the story's event unfolded


Is Herbert Morrisons radio broadcast a primary or secondary source?

Herbert Morrison's radio broadcast is considered a primary source. This is because it provides firsthand accounts and direct evidence of events as they unfolded at the time of the broadcast, specifically the Hindenburg disaster in 1937. Primary sources are original materials that offer direct insight into a particular historical moment, making Morrison's broadcast an invaluable resource for understanding that event.


Would letters and diaries of soldiers always be accurate historical evidence?

Yes, because letters and diaries of soldiers would be considered what is called a primary source. A primary source is a document or artefact created at the time of the event. This means that letters and diaries of soldiers would be considered accurate historical evidence.


Which is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history?

Corroborated sources of historical evidence. (APEX) !/


Is The Titanic A Primary or secondary source?

It depends what you are talking about. RMS Titanic is a primary source, as it is the real thing. But books and paintings that were made after the event are secondary sources. Hope this helped :)


Is a second hand source reliable?

Historians will examine a second hand source of a historical event. If the second hand source matches up to other sources of information, then each source in a certain manner adds to the credibility of the historical event.


What text is valuable for gaining context about a historical event but is unreliable as evidence?

textbook


Which text is valuable for gaining context about a historical event but is unreliable as evidence?

textbook


Why would researcher use primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event?

Answer this question… To evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event


Why would a researcher uses a primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event?

Answer this question… To evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event


What do you call a piece of historical information from a person who was actually at an event such as antonio pigafettas journal?

A piece of historical information from a person who was actually at an event is called a primary source. Primary sources provide firsthand accounts or direct evidence about a historical topic, such as journals, letters, photographs, or official documents. Antonio Pigafetta's journal is a prime example of a primary source, offering insight into his experiences during Ferdinand Magellan's expedition.