answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the standered procedures followed in a court of law?

i dont know i was thnking if you new? .... lol :P


Is it permissible for a confession to be used as evidence in a court of law?

Yes, confessions can be used as evidence in a court of law, but there are rules and procedures that must be followed to ensure the confession was obtained legally and voluntarily.


What does the united federal gorvernment use to ensure laws and fair and equally applied?

The law is applied and if it isn’t followed there are court procedures that happen.


Of the several paternity tests and procedures involved when do you consider it admissible in a court of law and validated?

There are different procedures to perform a paternity test but it can be admissible in a court of law only when the a strict chain of custody is followed. This chain of custody ensures that the sample came from a specified party and that the sample was not tampered with in any way.


What does a judge do in a court room?

They rule on points of law and ensure that the trial is conducted in accordance with the prescribed law and court procedures.


What is the next highest court with appellate jurisdiction after the district court?

The next highest court with appellate jurisdiction after the district court is the Court of Appeals, also known as the Circuit Court in some jurisdictions. These courts review decisions made by district courts to ensure that the law was applied correctly and that proper procedures were followed. In the federal system, there are 13 Courts of Appeals, while state systems may have varying numbers and structures of appellate courts.


List three sources of law that govern evidence?

Some states and the federal government have a standard set of evidence rules. These rules are then modified when judges rule on what the rules mean. Some states decide all evidence questions case-by-case with the highest court in the state having the final say on any question.


How does an administrative agency hearing differ from a court trial?

An administrative agency hearing involves an expertise in a specific area of law or regulation and typically has less formal procedures compared to a court trial. In a court trial, a judge or jury presides over the case and follows formal legal procedures set by the court system.


What is the alternative of precedent law?

Where the law does not set a precedent to be followed by Courts lower in the Court hierarchy, it must turn to the Statute (or legislation) that is prescribed in that area


Which part of the government according to the constitution is made up of justices who make sure that law are followed?

The supreme court


Who presides over tom's trial?

A judge typically presides over a trial, making sure that legal procedures are followed and deciding on matters of law.


How do you request a hearing?

That depends on who you are asking for the hearing. In a "Court of Law" you must have an active case before the court, then file a motion that the court must rule on and after the other parties (or state) is served with a copy of the motion, you request that the court administrator set a hearing for the motion (or case, if you have announced ready for trial). In an "Administrative Court" (a quasi non-judicial court) the procedures differ greatly and you need to contact the court to find their procedures.