(in the US) The question is a true statement, but they are not limited to that specific narrow role.
Yes, the statement Bill is nice is true, given those conditions.
It is not legally binding
Yes, this is a true statement.
true
All of the above
No. The statement is true.
It explains the organization of the federal government.
It explains the organization of the federal government.
All of the above.
If the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then "This statement is false" is true, making the statement false. But if the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then... It's one of the biggest paradoxes ever, just like saying, "I'm lying right now."
Circular logic would be a statement or series of statements that are true because of another statement, which is true because of the first. For example, statement A is true because statement B is true. Statement B is true because statement A is true
Settlers included European and Asian immigrants.
I do not feel that is a true statement. Please tell us why you feel it is.
In computing, this is an AND statement.
always true
always true