answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

emphasis on emotion and admirtation for the noble savage

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did Jean-Jacque Rousseau ideas differ from other Enlightenment philosophers?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

In what way did some of the enlightenment thinkers differ in their views?

Some Enlightenment thinkers differed in their views on the role of religion in society. For example, while Voltaire advocated for religious tolerance and criticized organized religion, Rousseau believed in a more personal, emotional connection to spirituality. Additionally, philosophers like Locke focused on individual rights and freedoms, while Hobbes emphasized the need for strong governmental control to maintain order.


How did Rousseau differ from the voltaire?

Rousseau emphasized the importance of emotions and intuition in human nature, while Voltaire focused on reason and critical thinking. Rousseau also advocated for a more direct form of democracy and criticized social hierarchies, while Voltaire supported a more enlightened despotism and was less critical of existing social structures.


How did the enlightenment both resemble and differ from the scientic revolution?

The enlightenment and the scientific revolution resemble each other in that they both are ways that humans of that time assess their place in the natural world.æ They differ in that one is based on scientific measuresæand one is based on religous or philosophical measures.æ


How do rule by divine right and rule by an enlightened despot differ?

Enlightened despots applied Enlightenment ideas to the government


How did Hobbes and Rousseau differ in their view of the ideal form of government?

Hobbes believed in an absolute monarchy as the ideal form of government to maintain order and prevent chaos. Rousseau, on the other hand, preferred a form of direct democracy where all citizens have a say in decision-making to promote freedom and equality.


How did greek philosophers differ from others in determining why things happened in their world?

They differed because they used theology and cosmology to liberate their thoughts on why things happened in their world.


How do Rousseau and Wordsworth compare in the ways they approach natural man?

Rousseau and Wordsworth both emphasize the purity and simplicity of the natural man, but they differ in their views on society's impact on human nature. Rousseau argues that society corrupts the natural man, while Wordsworth suggests that reconnecting with nature can restore humanity's lost innocence. Despite these differences, both thinkers highlight the importance of the natural world in shaping human character and values.


How did Hobbes and Rousseau differ on the nature of man?

Hobbes believed that man is naturally self-interested and prone to conflict, leading him to advocate for a strong government to maintain order. Rousseau, on the other hand, believed that man is naturally good but corrupted by society, and advocated for more decentralized forms of government to promote individual freedom and equality.


How did the ruling philosophers of Joseph Stalin and Benito Mussolini differ?

How do japans actions before and during world war 11 compare with hermanys action over the same period


How did Rousseaus idea differ from theirs?

Rousseau's idea differed from his contemporaries in his belief in the natural goodness of humanity and the corrupting influence of society. He argued for a more egalitarian society with a social contract based on the general will of the people rather than the rule of a monarch or aristocracy. Rousseau also emphasized the importance of education and the need for a more compassionate and harmonious social order.


How does the Buddhist opinion of material wealth differ from that if Hinduism?

Buddhists believe material wealth is a cause of suffering and an obstacle to enlightenment. On the other hand, Hindus believe material wealth can be a virtue that can lead to reincarnation into a better life.


How does the way scientists today develop ideas differ from the way the greek philosophers developed ideas?

Scientists today rely heavily on empirical evidence, experimentation, and peer review to develop and validate their ideas, while Greek philosophers used more deductive reasoning, logic, and thought experiments. Additionally, modern scientists work within established frameworks and theories, building on existing knowledge through collaboration and specialization, whereas Greek philosophers often sought universal truths through individual contemplation and debate.