The Scots won the Battle of Banockburn because King Robert the Bruce had experienced being a military commander and Edward the II didn't have a clue how to rule a country or even lead a battle. Robert the Bruce had successful strategies and tactics , the English army didn't know what to expect and just hoped for the best
Yes: The English committed unsupported cavalry (Knights in Armour) & the Scots dealt with them sumarily.
Byzantine lost to Seljuk Turks.
bro i just looked di up
The Greek alliance fleet failed to defeat the Persian fleet in the nearby strait of Axxxxx, which was the reason to block the Thermopylai pass - to force the sea battle.
Roman soldiers were defeated by the Visigoths and Rome was forced to give land to the Visigoths
It continued on for another 150 years until taken over by Macedonia led by Alexander the Great.
The Battle of Bannockburn. Robert the Bruce defeats Edward II.
1930
1314
At Bannockburn, a small place in Scotland.
June 1314
Bannockburn
1314
It was a battle (part of a bigger conflict) and was known as the Battle of Bannockburn. It took place in Bannockburn (strangely enough) in Scotland.
The Scottish Army under Robert the Bruce (Robert I) defeated the larger English Army under Edward II.
It was in 1314 A.D.
there were only 2
Scotland did not want to be ruled by England.