answersLogoWhite

0

The ten Tribunes of the Plebs were each able to impose a veto on legislation in the Senate - this veto invalidated legislation the veto was imposed on.

This was part of the arrangements brought in as the plebs progressively limited the powers of the traditional patrician rulership.

When Augustus was trying to settle the political disorganisation of the Roman revolution, he gave himself the permanent powers of a tribune of the plebs - that is the ability to introduce legislation into the senate, and the power to veto legislation, and effective way of controlling laws selectively on their merits.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra
SteveSteve
Knowledge is a journey, you know? We'll get there.
Chat with Steve
More answers

During the 482-year period of the Roman Republic magistrates (executive officers of state) of the same rank could veto each other's actions and magistrates of higher rank could veto the actions of magistrates of lower rank. The plebeian tribunes could veto each other's actions and those of any magistrate. The power to veto was related specifically to actions and therefore required the physical presence of the vetoing magistrate or plebeian tribunes to stop the action. Besides the veto of actions, any magistrate or plebeian tribune could veto a senatum consultum. This was a written opinion issued by the senate in response to having been consulted by a consul (on of the two heads of the Republic) on the drafting of bills before submitting them to the vote of the popular assemblies or by a praetor (the chief justice) on the amendment of existing laws . Despite this being meant to be merely advice (the senate was an advisory body, not a legislative one) a negative response by the senate would customarily lead to the abandonment or amendment of a bill. The plebeian tribunes could also veto each other's bills before they were put to the vote of the Plebeian Council. This was the system of checks and balances of power of the Roman Republic which was due to the fact that the Republic did not have a centralised government, like an administration or a cabinet, and each magistrate operated independently within the remit of his office.

Ther demise of the Roman Republic and the creation of rule by emperors, the magistrates ceased to be elected. Some magistracies were abolished and with the remaining ones the magistrates became appointees of the emperor, who was an absolute ruler. The power to veto disappeared.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was veto in Ancient Rome?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Ancient History

What power did tribunes have?

By the terms of the Act of Union 1841 the capital of the new province would be Kingston. English would be the official languages of the Assembly; the united colony would assume the debts of Upper Canada; the Assembly would consist of 84 members - 42 from Upper Canada and 42 from Lower Canada. This arrangement did not set well with Lower Canada as they did not have a debt.


Why is ancient rome underground?

There was Ancient Rome before present day Rome right? So - eventually, Ancient Rome started slipping away and archeologists just built over Anciet Rome. That kept happening until they had present day Rome and Ancient Rome - but Ancient Rome was underground


When was Ancient Rome was founded?

Ancient Rome was founded in 753 B.C.E.


Did ancient rome have any TVs?

No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.


How does artist from ancient Greece contrast to ancient rome?

Ancient rome were anonymous, poorly paid workers.