answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

both were born in there social status

2nd answer: Slavery did exist in the middle ages, particularly in the early middle ages, but it steadily decreased over time, primarily due to the influence of the church, which opposed enslaving Christians. It had largely disappeared, at least in Western Europe, by the 13th century.

Serfs were not fully free individuals, but they were not chattel slaves. Serfs owed labor to their lord, but they also worked their own lands and animals. If fortunate or shrewd a peasant family could acquire more land and move from subsistence to generating a surplus for cash sale. Some serfs were able to hire other to do their required labor for them. They might also have hired men to assist with their farm work, and in some cases even had household servants. A very few acquired enough land to have tenants of their own, essentially becoming minor gentry landlords.

Also, not all peasants were serfs, some were free men. The status of serf or free did not always correlate to wealth. A free man might be a poor cottager, and a serf, despite his unfree status, might have considerable wealth.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

A serf was a slave a freeman wasn't (hence the name "free" man)

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Someone

Lvl 2
3y ago

I honestly don't know that's why i came here

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

CoolestTax36

Lvl 2
3y ago

so

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How are the serfs and freemen similar?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about History of Western Civilization
Related questions

How were serfs different from freemen?

Serfs were slaves tied to the land and lord and nothing would free them. Freemen were peasants who had bought their freedom.


What types of peasants were there in the middle ages?

Serfs and Freemen


Could freemen could rent land and hire serfs?

True.


Who benefits the most from feudalism?

the lords, knights, kings, queens, serfs, and freemen got it the best


Why were some peasants freemen and the others villeins?

The villains were considered freemen among the serfs, but a subject under the king Both villains and serfs exchanged manual labor on the manors grounds for produce and rent. These conditions continued into the 15th century when tenure and free labor gained prominence.


King lords vassal's knights peasants and serfs is this the ranking of people in medieval times?

In secular society, the order was:Royalty at the topNobilityFree people, including merchants, tradesmen, and so onSerfsand sometimes there were slavesKnights, who were usually considered to be the lowest rank of nobility.Peasants included freemen, serfs and slaves. Freemen were independent farmers. Serfs were dependents of nobles or landed gentry, to whom they owed allegiance; serfs were not entirely free, but were not slaves either. Most countries did not have slaves.


would slaves be considered peasants?

No . Unlike serfs and freemen slaves did not have rights and were sold to higher ranked people like kings


What are serfs similar to?

Slaves


What is a brewers place on the hierachy in medieval society?

Brewers were freemen, and were above serfs but below the nobility, in the middle class with other merchants and tradesmen.


In Russia serfs were similar to?

slaves


The Japanese peasants were similar to?

The European Serfs.


What we're serfs similar to in Russia?

slaves.