Yes, an aristocrat would give serfs land in an agreement that the serf would protect the lord.
a serf is a person who worked on the lord manor and make food
Serfs were slaves tied to the land and lord and nothing would free them. Freemen were peasants who had bought their freedom.
they get free bananas
The king gave political system that gave nobles, peasants and serfs prtection. Because the king needs safety and he gave the nobles and peasants and serfs a home and shelter so he could have safety
False. Serfs were legally bound to a certain piece of land and obligated to work for the lord who owned that land, but they were not considered slaves as they were not owned by the lord and did have some legal rights and protections.
The Serfs lived under the estates of the Lord, along with Peasants.
Yes, an aristocrat would give serfs land in an agreement that the serf would protect the lord.
In the Manor System the mutual obligations meat the lord provide military protection for his serfs and the serfs provided labor.
a serf is a person who worked on the lord manor and make food
They were called serfs. Since they were not slaves, it is not precise to say they were owned by the lord.
false
The lord was angry at the serfs for they weren't doing their job.
The serf's master was a lord. This was not always a title with a specific rank attached to it, so it could have applied to a knight, or even a person of no title at all. The person who organized serfs was often called a reeve. This person was appointed by the lord or elected by the serfs with the lords final approval, depending on the traditions at the particular manor. The reeve was often a serf himself, and acted as the representative of the other serfs to the lord, and of the lord to the other serfs. His job also included assignment of jobs and land.
the feudal system for serfs was a bad thing because they always had to do work for the kings,lord and/or knights.
Serfs were bound to the fief and their lord.
Serfs