0
I don’t know but follow me on ig silverqueef you already know
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did plebeians get the right to veto?
The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.
How did the struggle between the patricians and the plebeian affect roman government?
The Roman government broadened its scope after the struggle. The Plebeians received attention from the government and enjoyed the protection of their civil rights. The government revoked the patriciansâ?? sole right to serve in the government.
What was the the name for the smaller groups that the centuries split into in the roman army?
The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.
Why were Romans consuls awarded the power of the veto?
The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank. The tribune of the plebeians, who was the representative of the plebeians (commoners), but not an officer of state, also had to power of veto. The power to veto the actions of officers of state was the Roman system of checks and balances of power. It was meant to reduce the chance that the officers would abuse their power. The power of veto of the tribune of the plebeians was also meant to prevent the abuse of the commoners by the state.
What rights did plebeians gain?
The plebeians had the rights of a Roman citizen. The law gave all Roman citizens the same rights. Social inequality was not based on the law. It was determined by differences in wealth and status.
What does the plebeians have the right?
The plebeians were Roman citizens. All Roman citizens enjoyed equality before the law, and therefore had the same rights. The plebeians were all the non-patricians (the patricians were the aristocracy). threfroe they were the commoners.
What effect did the tribunes have on the rights of plebeians?
If you are referring to the plebeian tribunes (as opposed to the military tribunes) they were the representatives of the plebeians. As such they often fought for the improvement of the conditions of the plebeians, rather than their rights, as all Roman citizens had the same rights.
How many groups of gymnosperms exist today?
There are four main groups of gymnosperms that exist today, namely cycads, Ginkgo biloba, gnetophytes, and conifers. These groups are distinct based on their morphology and reproductive structures.
What were the differences and similarities between patricians and plebeians?
The family was structured in the same way in both classes, the head of the family was the oldest male. That could be the father, the grandfather, or perhaps ever an uncle. Everybody in one family lived under one roof. Women had no authority exept in the home, old age was honored.
Why did plebeians strike?
This is a very good question. If you don't know, Plebeians didn't have all the rights that patricians did. They had limited voices in the government and were less important then the patricians. The Plebeians didn't like what they had so they striked and marched out of Rome. They refused to return to Rome until they had the same rights as the Patricians did. So finally, the Patricians agreed and Plebeians had more rights but still not as much as the Patricians. Though, they made a 3rd group and elected leaders called "Tribunes". Since there were more Plebeians than Patricians, the Plebeians were allowed to control the 3rd group.
What does the silicon chip do in 1970s?
Much the same as they do today, but only with a larger architecture due to cruder methods and then as yet to be developed materials for better performance.
What role did the plebeians have in the Roman government?
The big change that the plebeians were able to bring about with their protests, was one of opportunity. They won the right to have the laws written so that they were clear and not interpreted according to a patrician's whim. This gave them the opportunities inerrant in civil rights under the law. They also had the opportunities to run for political office and become consuls. By the mid-republic, one consul had to be a plebeian. However, the actual government remained the same, with the same types of officials, same methods of proposing laws and same methods of voting and passing a law.
How have attitudes towards the different groups changed Stayed the same?
well this is Malik brown they have changed back in the day people were using Afican as slaves but not today it has changed but it still goes on today
Did plebeians get the right to veto?
The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.
What role did the plebeians play in Julius Caesar?
Plebeians didn't have an actual role in the play. Although Plebeians were important they were the ones that Mark Antony and Brutus were trying to manipulate. Rome only runs in what the Plebeians say. If they say they don't want that person to be king;he will not, if they say he shall then he will. Even though the Plebeians are illiterate they still understand the right and wrong. They are very fickle, easily swayed and manipulated. If you have realised, in Mark Antony's speech,(in the film) the plebeians follow each other as an "Mexican wave" if one plebeian says 'The will, the will! we will hear Caesar's will!' everyone else copy's and repeats the same words. Hope that helped!
What on periodic table groups have in common?
The groups have equal number of valence electrons. The elements in same groups have same chemical properties.
How did the aborigines live before the British came to Australia?
They lived in there tribal groups, living with the land and the animals. They never took more than they needed and moved around as not to clear one area of its animals and plants. They also took care of the land by using the same burning off methods we use to stop major bushfire today.
