answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank. The tribune of the plebeians, who was the representative of the plebeians (commoners), but not an officer of state, also had to power of veto.

The power to veto the actions of officers of state was the Roman system of checks and balances of power. It was meant to reduce the chance that the officers would abuse their power. The power of veto of the tribune of the plebeians was also meant to prevent the abuse of the commoners by the state.

User Avatar

Raven Altenwerth

Lvl 13
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why were Romans consuls awarded the power of the veto?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about History of Western Civilization

Did the Greeks or the Romans give veto power?

Romans did and I beleive the Greeks did too but I'm not positive


Why was the roman consuls awarded the power of the veto?

The Roman republic was created after ousting the Etruscan king, Tarquinius Superbus (Teraquin the proud). The Roman senate wanted to ensure no such dictator could reign in Rome again. The senate gave itself the power to veto outlandish laws, like "everyone must give Maximus all their money or else they will die". Its also just the democratic thing to do.


In times of crisis who did the Romans choose to lead the city?

During the period of the Roman Republic, there were two heads of state called consuls. They were elected for a one-year term and each had veto power over the other. However, during periods of crisis they could nominate a dictator who had absolute power for the duration of the crisis.


Did plebeians get the right to veto?

The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.The plebeians had the power of the veto in ancient Rome. Their tribunes were plebeians.


What were the powers of the roman consul?

The limits were that the consul's term was only one year long, the same person could not be elected consul again for 10 years and one consul could always overrule, or veto the others decisions.

Related questions

How was the power of Romans consuls limited?

The power of the Roman consuls was limited by the veto of the tribunes, or in later times, by the emperor.


Why were roman consuls awarded the power the veto?

The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank. The tribune of the plebeians, who was the representative of the plebeians (commoners), but not an officer of state, also had to power of veto. The power to veto the actions of officers of state was the Roman system of checks and balances of power. It was meant to reduce the chance that the officers would abuse their power. The power of veto of the tribune of the plebeians was also meant to prevent the abuse of the commoners by the state.


Why were Roman awarded the power of the veto?

The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank. The tribune of the plebeians, who was the representative of the plebeians (commoners), but not an officer of state, also had to power of veto. The power to veto the actions of officers of state was the Roman system of checks and balances of power. It was meant to reduce the chance that the officers would abuse their power. The power of veto of the tribune of the plebeians was also meant to prevent the abuse of the commoners by the state.


Who had the power to veto actions other govermnt officials?

consuls


This branch of the Roman government was given veto power?

All the Magistrates had the power of veto, they could veto the actions of all magistrates underneath them, but the Tribunes of the Plebs could veto all magistrates, including Consuls.


What are the names of two men who ruled the government and had the power to veto each others actions?

they were the consuls.they were the consuls.they were the consuls.they were the consuls.they were the consuls.they were the consuls.they were the consuls.they were the consuls.they were the consuls.


Did the Greeks or the Romans give veto power?

Romans did and I beleive the Greeks did too but I'm not positive


How can you describes the limits that were placed on the power of the roman consuls?

The main limit on the power of the two consuls was that their term of office was one year. After one year two new consuls were elected. There were two consuls instead of one was so that the two of them could counterbalance each other. The consuls could also veto each other's actions.


Who had the right to veto each other's decisions?

Consuls


Who currently has a line-item veto power?

In the United States, currently no one has line-item veto power. It was awarded to the president in 1996, but was later deemed unconstitutional in 1998.


Why was the roman consuls awarded the power of the veto?

The Roman republic was created after ousting the Etruscan king, Tarquinius Superbus (Teraquin the proud). The Roman senate wanted to ensure no such dictator could reign in Rome again. The senate gave itself the power to veto outlandish laws, like "everyone must give Maximus all their money or else they will die". Its also just the democratic thing to do.


In times of crisis who did the Romans choose to lead the city?

During the period of the Roman Republic, there were two heads of state called consuls. They were elected for a one-year term and each had veto power over the other. However, during periods of crisis they could nominate a dictator who had absolute power for the duration of the crisis.