0
Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois wanted to encourage people to live in the west territories that were created by the Kansas-Nebraska act. In these territories popular sovereignty was used to determine the issue of slavery. Settlers that came to the new territories would be allowed to vote if slavery would be allowed.
Both territories were North of latitude 36.30, and according to the Missouri compromise, slavery was banned in the territories north of this line. the Kansas-Nebraska act would cancel the Missouri compromise. This caused some of the Northerners to feel betrayed by Douglas.
It was clear that it would be a close-run contest, so outsiders from both sides moved into the state and bought cheap properties in order to qualify for the vote.
Some of them went further and intimidated the locals, as well as trying to upset the ballots and declare them void.
This led to a lot of violence.
The elections offered a temptation to pro-slavery gangsters to cast illegal votes and intimidate the locals into supporting slavery, and some New England Abolitionists crossed the state border and clashed with those groups.
There was a good deal of bloodshed, also accusations of rigged results, and it was some time before it became clear that Kansas was voting free-soil.
It brought every bully-boy in America to thinly-populated Kansas, to intimidate the locals who were trying to vote on whether Kansas shiould be slave or free.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What did Stephen Douglas's theory of popular sovereignty lead to?
It seemed like a reasonable solution to the slavery debate - let the people of each new state vote on whether it would be slave or free. The flaw in the argument was that the states would be voting one at a time. So every bully-boy in America, from both sides, would descend on one thinly-populated area to commit maximum mayhem. When it was tried-out, in Kansas, the result was called 'Bleeding Kansas'.
Why did popular sovereignty lead to Bleeding Kansas?
Because terrorists know how to take advantage of popular sovereignty! All manner of cross-border ruffians came over to intimidate voters and declare all results to be rigged. In the end, Kansas was voted free soil - but at a terrible cost in bloodshed. The experiment was not repeated.
How did the Kansas-Nebraska Act lead to the creation of the Republican Party?
Ybtbtbfbyunhjnnh
How did the Kansas-Nebraska act lead to bleeding Kansas?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act also led to "Bleeding Kansas," a mini civil war that erupted in Kansas in 1856. Northerners and Southerners flooded Kansas in 1854 and 1855, determined to convert the future state to their view on slavery.
How did the war effect depressed soldiers?
War can lead to soldiers returning home with conditions such as PTSD and depression. This can lead to suicide and violence.
Why did popular sovereignty in fact lead to Bleeding Kansas instead of settling the issue of slavery in the Kansas-Nebraska territory?
Popular sovereignty allowed each territory to decide on the issue of slavery through a popular vote. This led to intense and violent conflicts like Bleeding Kansas because pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers flooded the territory to sway the vote in their favor, resulting in armed confrontations and confusion. The inability to peacefully settle the issue in Kansas-Nebraska demonstrated the limitations and flaws of popular sovereignty as a solution to the slavery debate.
What effect did the Kansas act of 1854 have on the conflict over slavery?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 led to widespread violence in the Kansas Territory between pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers, known as "Bleeding Kansas." The act allowed the settlers to decide through popular sovereignty whether Kansas would allow slavery, intensifying the sectional conflict over slavery in the lead-up to the Civil War.
What were the steps that lead to bloodshed in kansas?
The violence in Kansas, known as "Bleeding Kansas," resulted from clashes between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces over the issue of whether Kansas would enter the Union as a free or slave state. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which allowed popular sovereignty to determine the state's status, led to a flood of settlers on both sides, resulting in violent conflicts and bloodshed. This period marked a precursor to the larger tensions that would eventually lead to the American Civil War.
How did popular sovereignty lead to the US Civil War?
people dident votei don't think the popular sovereignty have anything do to with leading to the civil war.
The Founders feared popular sovereignty would lead to?
Mob rule.
Why did Stephen Douglas propose the Kansas Nebraska act lead to violence?
Plantation owners were outraged that slavery had been outlawed in the territories. People in the territories were angry that a new political party had been established. Many Americans disagreed with the Supreme Court decision to limit slavery in the territories. Opposing forces clashed because they disagreed about popular sovereignty and slavery.
How did the Kansas- Nebraska act lead to violence in Kansas?
The Kansas - Nebraska Act was passed with the idea that the citizens could decide amongst themselves whether to vote for slavery or not. In Nebraska the non slavery group was fairly well established. Not the same thing however in Kansas. There bitter and Strong feelings on both sides of the issue resulted in violence between pro and anti slavery groups.
What did Stephen Douglas's theory of popular sovereignty lead to?
It seemed like a reasonable solution to the slavery debate - let the people of each new state vote on whether it would be slave or free. The flaw in the argument was that the states would be voting one at a time. So every bully-boy in America, from both sides, would descend on one thinly-populated area to commit maximum mayhem. When it was tried-out, in Kansas, the result was called 'Bleeding Kansas'.
Why did popular sovereignty lead to Bleeding Kansas?
Because terrorists know how to take advantage of popular sovereignty! All manner of cross-border ruffians came over to intimidate voters and declare all results to be rigged. In the end, Kansas was voted free soil - but at a terrible cost in bloodshed. The experiment was not repeated.
Why did the kansas-nebraska act of 1854 directly lead to the civil war?
It demonstrated that the slavery question would never be settled except through violence.
What nickname did the fighting in kansas lead to?
Prior to Kansas joining the Union, the Kansas Territory was a hotbed of violence and chaos between anti-slavery and pro-slavery settlers. Kansas was known as Bleeding Kansas as these forces collided over the issue of slavery in the United States. The term "Bleeding Kansas" was coined by Republican Horace Greeley, editor of the New York Tribune.
Why did popular sovereignty lead to bleeding kansas instead of settling the issue of slavery in the nebraska territory?
If you allow one state at a time to vote on the slavery issue, that one (thinly-populated) state is going to be a magnet for every terrorist from both sides to invade the area to intimidate voters.
