0
Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois wanted to encourage people to live in the west territories that were created by the Kansas-Nebraska act. In these territories popular sovereignty was used to determine the issue of slavery. Settlers that came to the new territories would be allowed to vote if slavery would be allowed.
Both territories were North of latitude 36.30, and according to the Missouri compromise, slavery was banned in the territories north of this line. the Kansas-Nebraska act would cancel the Missouri compromise. This caused some of the Northerners to feel betrayed by Douglas.
What else can I help you with?
What did Stephen Douglas's theory of popular sovereignty lead to?
It seemed like a reasonable solution to the slavery debate - let the people of each new state vote on whether it would be slave or free. The flaw in the argument was that the states would be voting one at a time. So every bully-boy in America, from both sides, would descend on one thinly-populated area to commit maximum mayhem. When it was tried-out, in Kansas, the result was called 'Bleeding Kansas'.
Why did popular sovereignty lead to Bleeding Kansas?
Because terrorists know how to take advantage of popular sovereignty! All manner of cross-border ruffians came over to intimidate voters and declare all results to be rigged. In the end, Kansas was voted free soil - but at a terrible cost in bloodshed. The experiment was not repeated.
How did the Kansas-Nebraska act lead to bleeding Kansas?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act also led to "Bleeding Kansas," a mini civil war that erupted in Kansas in 1856. Northerners and Southerners flooded Kansas in 1854 and 1855, determined to convert the future state to their view on slavery.
How did the Kansas-Nebraska Act lead to the creation of the Republican Party?
Ybtbtbfbyunhjnnh
How did the war effect depressed soldiers?
War can lead to soldiers returning home with conditions such as PTSD and depression. This can lead to suicide and violence.
What effect did the Kansas act of 1854 have on the conflict over slavery?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 led to widespread violence in the Kansas Territory between pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers, known as "Bleeding Kansas." The act allowed the settlers to decide through popular sovereignty whether Kansas would allow slavery, intensifying the sectional conflict over slavery in the lead-up to the Civil War.
Why did popular sovereignty in fact lead to Bleeding Kansas instead of settling the issue of slavery in the Kansas-Nebraska territory?
Popular sovereignty allowed each territory to decide on the issue of slavery through a popular vote. This led to intense and violent conflicts like Bleeding Kansas because pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers flooded the territory to sway the vote in their favor, resulting in armed confrontations and confusion. The inability to peacefully settle the issue in Kansas-Nebraska demonstrated the limitations and flaws of popular sovereignty as a solution to the slavery debate.
How did the popular sovereignty lead to violence in Kanss?
Popular sovereignty, the principle allowing settlers of a territory to decide whether to allow slavery, led to violence in Kansas during the mid-1850s, often referred to as "Bleeding Kansas." This approach intensified tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions, as both sides rushed to settle in the territory to influence the vote. Clashes erupted over the legality of slavery, resulting in violent confrontations, such as the sacking of Lawrence and the Pottawatomie Massacre. Ultimately, this turmoil reflected the broader national conflict over slavery, foreshadowing the Civil War.
What were the steps that lead to bloodshed in kansas?
The violence in Kansas, known as "Bleeding Kansas," resulted from clashes between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces over the issue of whether Kansas would enter the Union as a free or slave state. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which allowed popular sovereignty to determine the state's status, led to a flood of settlers on both sides, resulting in violent conflicts and bloodshed. This period marked a precursor to the larger tensions that would eventually lead to the American Civil War.
How did popular sovereignty lead to the US Civil War?
people dident votei don't think the popular sovereignty have anything do to with leading to the civil war.
The Founders feared popular sovereignty would lead to?
Mob rule.
Why did Stephen Douglas propose the Kansas Nebraska act lead to violence?
Plantation owners were outraged that slavery had been outlawed in the territories. People in the territories were angry that a new political party had been established. Many Americans disagreed with the Supreme Court decision to limit slavery in the territories. Opposing forces clashed because they disagreed about popular sovereignty and slavery.
Why did the Kansas Nebraska Act lead to violence in Kansas while the Compromise of 1850 did not cause violence in New Mexico or Utah?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed settlers in those territories to decide on the legality of slavery through popular sovereignty, intensifying tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions and leading to violent confrontations known as "Bleeding Kansas." In contrast, the Compromise of 1850 established a more ambiguous approach to slavery in New Mexico and Utah, without a direct mechanism for immediate conflict, which resulted in less intense rivalry and violence. Additionally, the population in New Mexico and Utah was less polarized and more focused on establishing local governance rather than contentious debates over slavery.
How did the Kansas- Nebraska act lead to violence in Kansas?
The Kansas - Nebraska Act was passed with the idea that the citizens could decide amongst themselves whether to vote for slavery or not. In Nebraska the non slavery group was fairly well established. Not the same thing however in Kansas. There bitter and Strong feelings on both sides of the issue resulted in violence between pro and anti slavery groups.
What did Stephen Douglas's theory of popular sovereignty lead to?
It seemed like a reasonable solution to the slavery debate - let the people of each new state vote on whether it would be slave or free. The flaw in the argument was that the states would be voting one at a time. So every bully-boy in America, from both sides, would descend on one thinly-populated area to commit maximum mayhem. When it was tried-out, in Kansas, the result was called 'Bleeding Kansas'.
Why did popular sovereignty lead to Bleeding Kansas?
Because terrorists know how to take advantage of popular sovereignty! All manner of cross-border ruffians came over to intimidate voters and declare all results to be rigged. In the end, Kansas was voted free soil - but at a terrible cost in bloodshed. The experiment was not repeated.
Why did the kansas-nebraska act of 1854 directly lead to the civil war?
It demonstrated that the slavery question would never be settled except through violence.
