0
Because terrorists know how to take advantage of popular sovereignty!
All manner of cross-border ruffians came over to intimidate voters and declare all results to be rigged.
In the end, Kansas was voted free soil - but at a terrible cost in bloodshed. The experiment was not repeated.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoBecause if only one state at a time is voting on the slavery issue, that one state is going to be a magnet for every bully-boy in America, from both sides, to intimidate voters and try to corrupt the ballot.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did the Kansas-Nebraska act lead to bleeding Kansas?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act also led to "Bleeding Kansas," a mini civil war that erupted in Kansas in 1856. Northerners and Southerners flooded Kansas in 1854 and 1855, determined to convert the future state to their view on slavery.
What did Stephen Douglas's theory of popular sovereignty lead to?
It seemed like a reasonable solution to the slavery debate - let the people of each new state vote on whether it would be slave or free. The flaw in the argument was that the states would be voting one at a time. So every bully-boy in America, from both sides, would descend on one thinly-populated area to commit maximum mayhem. When it was tried-out, in Kansas, the result was called 'Bleeding Kansas'.
How did the Kansas-Nebraska Act lead to the creation of the Republican Party?
Ybtbtbfbyunhjnnh
How did popular sovereignty lead to violence in Kansas?
Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois wanted to encourage people to live in the west territories that were created by the Kansas-Nebraska act. In these territories popular sovereignty was used to determine the issue of slavery. Settlers that came to the new territories would be allowed to vote if slavery would be allowed. Both territories were North of latitude 36.30, and according to the Missouri compromise, slavery was banned in the territories north of this line. the Kansas-Nebraska act would cancel the Missouri compromise. This caused some of the Northerners to feel betrayed by Douglas.
What was John Browns role in the violence that lead to Bleeding Kansas?
John Brown came to the Kansas Territory to fight slavery. In May 1856 John Brown led a group that killed several proslavery settlers near Pottawatomie Creek. In August 1856, Brown and his followers engaged 400 pro-slavery U.S. soldiers in the "Battle of Osawatomie".
Why did popular sovereignty in fact lead to Bleeding Kansas instead of settling the issue of slavery in the Kansas-Nebraska territory?
Popular sovereignty allowed each territory to decide on the issue of slavery through a popular vote. This led to intense and violent conflicts like Bleeding Kansas because pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers flooded the territory to sway the vote in their favor, resulting in armed confrontations and confusion. The inability to peacefully settle the issue in Kansas-Nebraska demonstrated the limitations and flaws of popular sovereignty as a solution to the slavery debate.
What did the Kansas-Nebraska act lead to?
bleeding kansas, two governments in kansas
What did the Kansas- Nebraska Act lead to?
bleeding Kansas, two governments in kansas
What effect did the Kansas act of 1854 have on the conflict over slavery?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 led to widespread violence in the Kansas Territory between pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers, known as "Bleeding Kansas." The act allowed the settlers to decide through popular sovereignty whether Kansas would allow slavery, intensifying the sectional conflict over slavery in the lead-up to the Civil War.
What were the steps that lead to bloodshed in kansas?
The violence in Kansas, known as "Bleeding Kansas," resulted from clashes between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces over the issue of whether Kansas would enter the Union as a free or slave state. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which allowed popular sovereignty to determine the state's status, led to a flood of settlers on both sides, resulting in violent conflicts and bloodshed. This period marked a precursor to the larger tensions that would eventually lead to the American Civil War.
Why did popular sovereignty lead to bleeding kansas instead of settling the issue of slavery in the nebraska territory?
If you allow one state at a time to vote on the slavery issue, that one (thinly-populated) state is going to be a magnet for every terrorist from both sides to invade the area to intimidate voters.
How did popular sovereignty lead to the US Civil War?
people dident votei don't think the popular sovereignty have anything do to with leading to the civil war.
The Founders feared popular sovereignty would lead to?
Mob rule.
How did the Kansas-Nebraska act lead to bleeding Kansas?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act also led to "Bleeding Kansas," a mini civil war that erupted in Kansas in 1856. Northerners and Southerners flooded Kansas in 1854 and 1855, determined to convert the future state to their view on slavery.
What did Stephen Douglas's theory of popular sovereignty lead to?
It seemed like a reasonable solution to the slavery debate - let the people of each new state vote on whether it would be slave or free. The flaw in the argument was that the states would be voting one at a time. So every bully-boy in America, from both sides, would descend on one thinly-populated area to commit maximum mayhem. When it was tried-out, in Kansas, the result was called 'Bleeding Kansas'.
What nickname did the fighting in kansas lead to?
Prior to Kansas joining the Union, the Kansas Territory was a hotbed of violence and chaos between anti-slavery and pro-slavery settlers. Kansas was known as Bleeding Kansas as these forces collided over the issue of slavery in the United States. The term "Bleeding Kansas" was coined by Republican Horace Greeley, editor of the New York Tribune.
Why did the passages of the act lead to Bleeding Kansas and so much discord in American politics?
Passage of the act let to Bleeding Kansas because it caused violence over the issue of slavery. The state was supposed to vote about slavery, and people tried to force neighbors to be pro or anti slavery.
