0
What consequences did the Dred Scott decision have on free blacks?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Dred Scott v Sandford was a devastating decision for African Americans. The decision held that no person of African ancestry could claim citizenship in the United States. This meant that even in the so-called "free" states of the North, an African American had no rights of citizenship.
Although slavery was illegal in these "free" northern states, Scott v Sandford stated that a slaveholder could move into the states with his slaves and not lose them. In other words, the people were still slaves even though the law said it was illegal for them to be slaves.
Many freedmen living in the northern states fled the country following the decision in fear of former owners. Many more were placed back in bondage and forced to return to the South.
The decision, in 1857, infuriated the North, further polarizing relations between the North and the South. Certainly Scott v Sandford was not the only deciding factor in the outbreak of the Civil War, but it did play a significant role.
Dred Scott was freed by his owner May 26, 1857. He died a free man September 17, 1858 of tuberculosis. He had one child, a daughter, born in 1838.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who was dred scoot?
The Dred Scott decision electrified the the nation. chief justice Roger B. tanry said the Dred Scott was still a slave.
Why did it take so long to make a decision for Dred Scott's lawsuit?
*farts*
What was the taney court known for?
The Dred Scott decision and a philosophy of judicial restraint
What are some characteristics about Dred Scott?
What are some characteristics of Dred Scott
What years did the Dred Scott decision take place prior to the Civil War?
The Dred Scott decision or Dred Scott v. Sandford, took place in 1857. His case was based on the fact that he and his wife Harriet Scott were slaves, but had lived in states and territories where slavery was illegal, including Illinois and Minnesota (which was then part of the Wisconsin Territory). Dred Scott lost the case when The United States Supreme Court ruled seven to two, on the grounds that he, nor any person of African ancestry, could claim citizenship in the United States, and that therefore Scott could not bring suit in federal court under diversity of citizenship rules.
What consequences did the Dred Scott decision have for free blacks?
I dont know XD
What was the consequences of the Dred Scott decision for the enslaved people?
The Dred Scott decision is known as the worst decision ever by the Supreme Court. It said that blacks could not be citizens. Slavery was a decision of the new territories.
What did the supreme court dred Scott decision state?
no blacks, not even free blacks, could become U.S. citizens.
A major implication of the Dred Scott decision was that?
The Dred Scott decision held that black people were not citizens and did not have standing to sue in federal court. It also held that blacks were only 3/5 of a white person.
What supreme court ruling said that blacks could not become citizens of the US?
Dred Scott v. Sandford,* 60 US 393 (1857)*Sandford is misspelled in the court documents; the respondent's real last name was Sanford.
How did the northerners and southerners react to the Dred Scott decision?
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
What group was benefited most by dred Scott decision?
Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.
What did Stonewall Jackson think of the Dred Scott Decision?
Stonewell Jackson thought Dred Scott Decision was a supid idea
Which Chief Justice ruled on the Dred Scott decision?
The Chief US Supreme Justice at the time of the Dred Scott decision was Justice Taney. He wrote the majority decision that proclaimed that Blacks in the USA could never be citizens. It was a 7 to 2 decision.
Who was dred Scott and what was the dred Scott decision?
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
The dred Scott decision stated that slaves?
the dred scott decision stated that slaves are peoplealso and should'nt be property :D yurwelcomee
How did northerners and southerners react to the dred Scott?
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
