answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Holocaust is not regarded as a conlict because there was no fighting apart from in a few cases. It was murder, not warfare.

It was the slaughter of six almost entirely defenceless million Jews by the Nazis in World War 2. It wasn't a conflict ... It took place during World War 2, which of course was a conflict on a vast scale, but the two are not the same. The Holocaust was a kind of sub-plot during World War 2, but wasn't central to it.

The Holocaust was mass murder (genocide) on a vast scale: it was not a conflict. Adolf Hitler hated the Jews and held them responsible for all Germany's problems and for the outbreak of World War 2 (which he had started). Hitler was gripped by all kinds of bizarre conspiracy theories which claimed that 'the Jews' wanted to achieve world domination and were in competition with Germany for this.

Please see the related questions.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

Conflict is that many societies envied or distrusted Jews, and Hitler exploited this animosity, secretly attempting genocide in the guise of subjugating the race. Compromise is that for self-defense, the Allies destroyed Hitler and Nazi Germany, with the result that some Jews were saved. The historic lesson is invoked whenever one societal group attempts to exterminate another.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What do you mean 'what is the problem in the holocaust?' Millions of people were butchered, starved to death, murdered, gassed, hanged, torutred, burned alive for no reason what so ever. Children, millions of them, were sent to their deaths. The problem is that people don't see a problem with murdering, that they have no heart, no compassion, and no humanity.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

The Holocaust took place during World War 2 and may have been part of a wider campaign to rid Europe of what the Nazis regarded as 'Jewish Bolshevism'.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the conflict and compromise in the Holocaust?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was the conflict and compromise of the holocaust long answer please?

There was almost no conflict; it was very one-sided. It was full of compromise, mainly on the part of the victims, although you will find a few times that the presecutors had to compromise. Key points for you to look at are: - types of Nazi occupation (how independent were the occudied nations) - differing treatment of 'michling' - Judenrade - Speer's 'economic miracle'


How is the Holocaust an example of conflict and compromise in history?

Well, in order to provide an in depth analysis on whether or not there is a real resolution to the holocaust, the simple answer is there really isn't. the conflict is obviously there, millions of Jews were killed. However, the compromise is very vague and that if you are just asking this question to find a concrete History Day project, then pick another one - or else you're screwed. nice try.


What did the conflict start in the holocaust?

The Holocaust was not a conflict. It was nass murder. Please see the related question.


Where did the holocaust conflict take place?

The Holocaust was not a conflict, it was entirely one-sided, but it took place in Europe.


Is US women's rights to vote a conflict or compromise?

Is U.S. women's rights to vote a conflict or compromise?


Where did the conflict of the holocaust take place?

there was no real conflict of the Holocaust, it was very one-sided, but it took place in occupied Europe.


What is the conflict and compromise of the hippies?

boobs


What is the conflict and compromise in slaves and the sugar islands?

IT IS A CONFLICT AND COMPROMISE BECAUSE THEY SOLD SLAVES FOR SUGR AND SOME PEOPLE DIDNT AGREE WITH THIS.


What is the conflict and compromise of world war 2?

the conflict is they fought and the compromise is the war ended. They did fight but why was that??


Does compromise require that both sides in a conflict give something?

Yes, compromise means that both sides (or all sides) in a conflict give something.


How did the three fifths compromise resolve conflict?

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise over how slaves would be accounted for when determining population for congressional representation purposes. The conflict was between the Northern and Southern states.


How do you settle a conflict without war?

with compromise or arbitration.