The Holocaust is not regarded as a conlict because there was no fighting apart from in a few cases. It was murder, not warfare.
It was the slaughter of six almost entirely defenceless million Jews by the Nazis in World War 2. It wasn't a conflict ... It took place during World War 2, which of course was a conflict on a vast scale, but the two are not the same. The Holocaust was a kind of sub-plot during World War 2, but wasn't central to it.
The Holocaust was mass murder (genocide) on a vast scale: it was not a conflict. Adolf Hitler hated the Jews and held them responsible for all Germany's problems and for the outbreak of World War 2 (which he had started). Hitler was gripped by all kinds of bizarre conspiracy theories which claimed that 'the Jews' wanted to achieve world domination and were in competition with Germany for this.
Please see the related questions.
Chat with our AI personalities
Conflict is that many societies envied or distrusted Jews, and Hitler exploited this animosity, secretly attempting genocide in the guise of subjugating the race. Compromise is that for self-defense, the Allies destroyed Hitler and Nazi Germany, with the result that some Jews were saved. The historic lesson is invoked whenever one societal group attempts to exterminate another.
What do you mean 'what is the problem in the holocaust?' Millions of people were butchered, starved to death, murdered, gassed, hanged, torutred, burned alive for no reason what so ever. Children, millions of them, were sent to their deaths. The problem is that people don't see a problem with murdering, that they have no heart, no compassion, and no humanity.
the conflict is they fought and the compromise is the war ended. They did fight but why was that??
The Holocaust took place from about 1940 to 1945, the international conflict was the Second World War.
lick a my ballz
US military policy and civilian protests.
The Commerce Compromise addressed the conflict between Northern businessmen and Southern plantation owners over the issue of tariffs.