answersLogoWhite

0

Imperialism is defined as the policy by a country of extending its power through diplomacy or military force. The word is often used to describe countries who seek to gain control of or influence other countries.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about U.S. History
Related Questions

What is Natural resources and suggestions measures to conserve them?

the imperialism and anti imperialsim.


What were the factors that aided European imperialsim in the late 1800s?

1)_Economic_Factor 2) Nationalist FactorMilitary_FactorHumanitarian Factor


What led the European imperialsm?

what led to European imperialsim was an ego trippin' dictator called Mitch Rogers and he dominated the ancient world...oh and he was really short.


How did Imperialsim help ignite the war in Europe?

There were nations in Europe that competed each other with supplying raw materials and provided markets for manufactured goods.


What form of imperialsim Portugal practiced?

Portugal focused on trade in its colonies. Portuguese explorers were the first to discover Africa and they set up strategic posts and forts in the continent. These stations were instrumental in the lucrative gold and slave trade.


Where Did Germany have colonies during the time of imperialism?

During the Age of Imperialsim (circa 1700), Germany had relatively little impact on European colonialism that was spreading at the time.They did, however, manage to secure small footholds in Africa and the Caribbean, namely Ghana (Africa) and Tertholen (Caribbean).


What were the positive and negative efects of imperialsim on EGypt?

Positive effects of imperialism in Egypt are the industrialization of the nation and better sanitation and education. Negative effects are the amount of money that had to be paid to the British and that the British brought new disease.


How did the muken incident advance Japanese imperialsim?

The Mukden Incident, which occurred on September 18, 1931, was a staged event by Japanese military personnel that served as a pretext for the invasion of Manchuria. By fabricating an attack on a Japanese railway, Japan justified its military intervention and subsequent occupation of the region. This event marked a significant escalation in Japanese imperialism, as it led to the establishment of the puppet state of Manchukuo and expanded Japan's territorial ambitions in East Asia, ultimately contributing to tensions that precipitated World War II. The incident exemplified the aggressive expansionist policies that characterized Japanese imperialism in the early 20th century.


In what way were the white boers guilty of imperialsim?

The white Boers, primarily of Dutch descent, were guilty of imperialism through their expansionist policies in South Africa, particularly during the 19th century. They established Boer republics, such as the Transvaal and the Orange Free State, which involved the displacement and subjugation of indigenous African populations. Their desire for land and resources led to conflicts, notably the Anglo-Boer Wars, and exemplified a form of colonial dominance that sought to impose their cultural and political control over other groups. This expansion was driven by a belief in racial superiority and a desire for economic gain, characteristic of imperialist ideologies.


Is imperialism a stepping stone to democracy?

I see no reason to believe that Imperialism would be a stepping stone to democracy. Democratic ideals do not rely on significant land mass or population. Actually a smaller population and area is more suitable to a pure democracy. In a pure democracy every individual has a say in the government. Every law or change in government is voted on by the entire population. If you are referring to a Democratic-Republic (United States type of government) then the expansion of the nation did not hinder the government but has not helped it either. In most cases rapid expansion from imperialsim only adds to the strain on any government, making it difficult to enforce national policy.


How was European imperialsim still evident after ww1?

After World War I, European imperialism remained evident through the mandates established by the League of Nations, which allowed European powers to maintain control over former territories of the defeated Ottoman and German empires. Countries like Britain and France expanded their influence in the Middle East and Africa under the guise of "civilizing" these regions. Additionally, the economic and political dominance of European nations continued to shape global affairs, as they sought to extract resources and maintain trade networks in their colonies. This persistence of imperialist attitudes laid the groundwork for future conflicts and movements toward decolonization.


What areas of the world practice imperialsim today?

While traditional imperialism, characterized by direct territorial control, is largely a historical phenomenon, modern forms of imperialism manifest through economic and political influence. Regions such as parts of Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia often experience neo-imperialism, where powerful nations exert control via economic dependency, military presence, or cultural influence. Additionally, countries like China have engaged in practices like the Belt and Road Initiative, which some critics view as a form of economic imperialism aimed at expanding influence. Overall, modern imperialism is more subtle and involves complex geopolitical dynamics rather than outright colonization.