Oh, dude, here we go! So, technically speaking, Indians are not considered Caucasian. The term "Caucasian" typically refers to people of European descent, while Indians are usually classified as Asian. But hey, if you want to get all technical and stuff, some definitions of "Caucasian" include people from the Indian subcontinent, so like, who really knows, right?
Chat with our AI personalities
No, Indians are not considered Caucasian. The term "Caucasian" refers to people of European, Middle Eastern, and North African descent. Indians, on the other hand, are typically classified as belonging to the South Asian racial category. This distinction is based on physical characteristics, genetic markers, and historical migration patterns.
Yes a few percent might me australoid, mongolod mix, but majority are caucasians who migrated to India. This has been proven analyzing Skull structures of many indians, color doesn't determine race. There are white chinese & brown chinese. Indians are mainly Aryans & Dravidians, Dravidians are also considered caucasian by most Scientists. I am a scientist at Stanford, I analyzed a sample of 1000 Indian skulls, all 990 matched caucasian. But yes 10 of them showed other races.
Until the 80's it was mostly a Caucasian nation, but today because of immigration, there is much more racial diversity. It's still considered a Caucasian country.
A mix of Nationalism, Socialism and Social-Darwinism + the idea of a superior caucasian race.
The discovery shows that China was not a civilization that is isolated from other humans.
Yes he did - Manteo, a close person with John White was of Croatoan decent, his tribe was from there. Because of this, the Croatoan group was considered "friendly".
Indians in the great plains...savages...hated Indians