Ther is no British Ruler in India today, there is aPrime Minister Mamohan Singh and a President Pratibha PatilVICEROY
The British Raj ruled over the Indian subcontinent from 1858 to 1947. The power from the government and war eventually won India's it's independence and has since been an independent subcontinent.
A subsidiary alliance is an alliance between a dominant nation and a nation that it dominates.The doctrine of subsidiary alliance was introduced by Marquess Wellesley, British governor-general of India from 1798 to 1805. In the beginning of his governorship Wellesley adopted a policy of non-intervention but later he adopted the policy of subsidiary alliance. By the late 18th century, powerful emperors had disappeared from the Indian subcontinent. and it was left with numerous weaker smaller states. Many rulers accepted this offer of protection by Lord Wellesley.Its main principles were:a) Any Indian Ruler accepting subsidiary Alliance with the British had to keep British forces within their territory and agreed to pay for their maintenance.b) In lieu of the payments, some of the ruler's territory was ceded to the British.c) The rulers accepting it were forced to keep a British official at their court called the Resident.d) Expel all non English foreigners from his state. if the Indian rulers failed to make the payment then part of their territory was taken away as penalty Under this doctrine, Indian rulers under British protection suspended their native armies, instead maintaining British troops within their states. They surrendered control of their foreign affairs to the British. In return, the East India Company would protect them from the attacks of their rivals.The Nizam of Hyderabad was the first to enter into this alliance. Tipu Sultan of Mysore refused to accept it but after the British victory in the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War, Mysore was forced to become a subsidiary ally. Later the Maratha ruler Baji Rao II also accepted subsidiary alliance in the Treaty of Bassein.
A czar (tsar or tzar) was the ruler of old Russia.
which was not the fort of maratha ruler shivaji
its the colonial legislature ACTUALLY...Thats Wrong...Its a Royal governor.
Queen Victoria was the ruler of the British Empire at the time the Treaty of Waitangi was signed in 1840.
Great Britain was the colonial ruler of South Sudan.
In Case you didnt know, Guatemala is no longer a colony... thus there's no colonial ruler.
Spain
He never was officially appointed emperor. He was assassinated at the Senate before they declared him Supreme Ruler.
Pual Biya
spain
France
The only appointed "sole ruler" office was that of Dictator and he was only appointed in times of crisis. Until Julius Caesar, that is. Caesar was appointed Dictator for Life, but his life didn't last too long after that appointment.
HH Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed was appointed ruler of the UAE on November 3rd, 2004. He is still currently ruler of the UAE.
The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.