It does fall under the First Amendment (Freedom of Expression) and can, but this is rocky terrain. In a venue such as a school, where one's mode of dress can reasonably be considered disruptive, the manner of dress is not protected. In a public venue where one's clothing might represent a clear protest to the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan, or in general the "War on Terror," the Department of Homeland Security has determined that this could be an act of terrorism. Additionally, if the clothing in anyway can be considered a "breach of peace" or in any way can represent "fighting words," it is by no means protected.
From the Supreme Court decision in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 1942:
There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech [expression], the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or "fighting words" those that by their very utterance [expression] inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. It has been well observed that such utterances [expressions] are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality.
The Founders of the United States believed there to be a natural inheritance of rights to all people. Some of those individual rights are: the right to assembly, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, freedom of speech and freedom from unreasonable search and seizures.
Well there are many parts to the first amendment, so I will just cover all of them! freedom of speech: advantage - you can express yourself and let others know what you think disadvantage - people can get into arguments over things said or expressed freedom of religion: advantage - you can practice any religion you choose and not have to worry about the government not allowing it disadvantage - there are freaks and weirdos out there who think cutting people up and eating them is a religion freedom of assembly: advantage - you are free to have an assembly for whatever you want as long as it doesn't turn violent disadvantage - hate groups still have the right to burn crosses publicly and the government can't do anything about it freedom of petition: advantage - you can always right to the government without worrying about them suing disadvantage - I honestly can't think of any disadvantages to this one! freedom of the press: advantage - you can publish anything you want as long as what you publish is not slander disadvantage - people can say whatever they want about you, even if you don't want them to By:husam Ahmed
just the face
Suffrae and Politics ~Jaciel~
The heart of our rights as human beings is said as "The rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." {Notice that's PURSUIT not actual having happiness.} The Constitutional Amendments generated by the US Second Congress to meet the above statement included mainly ways to keep our government from abusing it's constituents and from one constituent from abusing another. 1 - (a) Right to free speech: the ability to have and say your own opinion in your own home. This also extends somewhat to public spaces. As long as the speech is not 'disrupting' of society as a whole and is not obscene, lewd or slanderous then it is protected. (b) Right to live your religion uninterfered in by government. (c) Right to free speech via press 2 - Right to bear arms for 2 reasons - (a) to be able to serve as part of a local Militia to defend town or city AND (b) for personal protection from other people who would attempt to that the right of life away. 3- Army cannot force a homeowner to give them free room and board (this often happened during war before now and it could bankrupt and/or destroy honest citizens' unfairly) 4 - Right to be free of unreasonable seizure and search: Policeman "I want to search your house just to check if you have stolen goods." Owner "Why would you think that?" Policeman "I don't have to, no need for any reason, I'm the law." And keeps the government from just seizing your property just willy-nilly "We're making a new road going right through your house, you need to move." "But I don't have the money to buy a new house!!" 5 - (a) Right to keep quiet about bad things you've done; that is, you cannot be compelled to tell on yourself. (b) Right to due process: the executive branch (law enforcement) must do the same paperwork and work up on everyone, no freebies. (c) Sets rules for arrest, indictment and conviction (d) sets rule of double jeopardy, you cannot be charged 2x for the same crime. 6 - (a) Speedy trial (law can't hold you for 40 years waiting for a courtroom) (b) right to trial by impartial jury and not just by judge (c) that the accused be able to face their accusers (someone can't be a witness and not be known by defense) - this is to keep down false accusations (d) accused has a right to a lawyer 7 - Guarantees trial by jury in federal civil court cases 8 - Punishments for law breaking be fair and outlandish fines not be set: you can't get 20 years in jail for spitting on the sidewalk. 9 - Is an open note that these proclamations may not cover everything clearly but that doesn't prove these other rights don't exist. 10 - Any power not conferred to US Government is passed on to the states themselves. Our system of law is about this " Your rights to do something end at the edge of my nose" That is,you have the freedom to do these things AS LONG AS you do not impinge on my rights to do the same.
Cause you to cover additional material that you do not need in your speech.
Cause you to cover additional material that you do not need in your speech
swathe
Political Speech is a type of "freedom of speech", and thus, falls under the protections outlined in the 1st Amendment to the Constitution. Historically, Political Speech is considered the most valuable form of speech, and has been provided the most protection.
When it comes to protests, freedom of speech covers people by allowing them to say whatever it is they believe. While many people may not agree with what is being said, people still have the right to speak their mind. As long as their protest does not become violent, they are allowed to do as they wish.
clothing they always wear clothing that doesn't cover all skin
swaddle
Swathe
cover
Khana ,pina.Gana,SEX enjoying life is freedom and culture is the thing to cover it.
Yes, clothing would be considered personal property.
The Amerindians wore a type of long sleeved clothing to cover themselves.