Actually, the first time young George was sent to lead was to the Ohio Territory in the French and Indian war. The opposing enemy took George by surprise-- he was forced to surrender. He was so humiliated and disillusioned that he vowed to never go into a battle again.
But he was tapped again to lead. He accepted but reluctantly.
What is now seen as a skill to retreat was actually more of an aversion to fight. He cared about his men; he understood their hardships because these were his hardships, too. We must put his life into context, so we understand his sacrifices--and his caution.
Actually, the first time young George was sent to lead was to the Ohio Territory in the French and Indian war. The opposing enemy took George by surprise-- he was forced to surrender. He was so humiliated and disillusioned that he vowed to never go into a battle again.
But he was tapped again to lead. He accepted but reluctantly.
What is now seen as a skill to retreat was actually more of an aversion to fight. He cared about his men; he understood their hardships because these were his hardships, too. We must put his life into context, so we understand his sacrifices--and his caution.
Actually, the first time young George was sent to lead was to the Ohio Territory in the French and Indian war. The opposing enemy took George by surprise-- he was forced to surrender. He was so humiliated and disillusioned that he vowed to never go into a battle again.
But he was tapped again to lead. He accepted but reluctantly.
What is now seen as a skill to retreat was actually more of an aversion to fight. He cared about his men; he understood their hardships because these were his hardships, too. We must put his life into context, so we understand his sacrifices--and his caution.
Actually, the first time young George was sent to lead was to the Ohio Territory in the French and Indian war. The opposing enemy took George by surprise-- he was forced to surrender. He was so humiliated and disillusioned that he vowed to never go into a battle again.
But he was tapped again to lead. He accepted but reluctantly.
What is now seen as a skill to retreat was actually more of an aversion to fight. He cared about his men; he understood their hardships because these were his hardships, too. We must put his life into context, so we understand his sacrifices--and his caution.
He was able to command the loyalty of his soldiers. That enabled them to overcome the hardships at Valley Forge to forge a professionally trained fighting force.
because he was a great leader and that he served in the military and was promoted up
strong of character and smart tactics
He was a strong military leader and in his teens he was a planter. I hope it helped!!! :)
General George Washington led the Continental Army and the states' militias in the war against England.
I assume you are talking about the Patriots from the American Revolution. Their leader was George Washington, who led them to victory and later was elected the first president of the new nation of the United States of America.
who is often ranked second to george washington as a military leader
Leading retreats that saved the lives of his men.
General George Meade
George Washington was the first president of the United States and a great military leader among his many achievements. He was also signed the Residence Act of 1790 establishing the capital of the U.S.
George Rogers Clark
because he was a great leader and that he served in the military and was promoted up
He was a Commander( i think )
he was the leader in the continnetal army and he sighed the declaration of independance
leading retreats that saved the lives of his men.
leading retreats that saved the lives of his men.
no
General Meade remained loyal to his former commander, George B. McClellan, even after Meade was appointed the leader of the Army of the Potomac. He, like McClellan outwardly criticized the political interference the military had to deal with concerning military issues.