answersLogoWhite

0

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

SteveSteve
Knowledge is a journey, you know? We'll get there.
Chat with Steve
DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
ViviVivi
Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.
Chat with Vivi

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Without what the government could not pay its employees or maintain an army?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

What did the doctrine of nullification maintain?

b. state government could nullify any federal law.


How important do you think unions are for present day workers?

Extremely important, practically essential. Without unions, corporations could do whatever they want which means treating all lower employees like garbage and pay them next to nothing. Corporations are one of the most corrupt things in this country and without unions they could do anything and they will do anything for money. Employees who are unionized tend to have higher pay and treated better than non-unionized employees


What is the reason for Checks and Balances?

Checks and balances allow the branches of government to equalize power. Without checks and balances, one branch of government could become too powerful.


The national government cannot spend money without proper legislation why is it important?

The American government cannot spend taxpayer money without legislation because the legislation keeps the government in check and helps to keep a record of what is being spent. Without these records, Congress could spend money on whatever it wanted to, without having to answer to anyone.


Could we have a workable system of government without judicial review?

Workable--yes. There have been many systems of government around the world that did not have judicial review.Fair--no. Without judicial review, someone in another branch of government gets to be the final arbiter of disputes about the meanings of laws. And those people are usually the ones who also have the guns