The North.
For this reason, Congress had tried to make a big gesture of appeasement to the South in the form of the Fugitive Slave Act - cracking-down on runaways.
This backfired badly, and 'Uncle Tom's Cabin' was written as a protest against it. The best-selling book caused a new spread of Abolitionist feeling in the North.
The Compromise of 1850gave something for both sides of the sectional battle, with the North perhaps coming out a bit better, with the balance of the Senate now being tipped in favor of the North. The South, however, scored a major victory with the Fugitive Slave Act. The act infuriated the North and was, perhaps more than anything, a push toward civil war.
It was looking favourable to the North. So Congress felt they had to make a big, dramatic gesture in favour of the South, in order to balance up.
That is why they passed the Fugitive Slave Act. It was saying "We can't hold out much hope of new slave-states. But my goodness, we'll crack down on those runaways."
The Act backfired badly, bringing new support for the Underground Railroad.
The crittenden compromise :) apex I got you
South-Gained more population North-Got more money towards there goverment because the 3/5 compromise for every the 3 of the 5 slaves 3 of them had to be taxed so the tax went to the norths goverment
Reconstruction came to an end due to the Compromise of 1877(compromise came about because of the disputed 20 electoral votes from the Election of 1876). Part of the compromise was for Rutherford Hayes (candidate to receive the disputed votes which would make him president if Republican agreed to compromise) was to pull federal troops out of the South. Pretty much as soon as Hayes got into office he signed the orders to pull the troops which was the final straw to the Democrat's "Redeemer" government taking over. Any ground that Recontruction had made since 1863 was down the tubes. We would not see another effective stab at Reconstruction until 1963.
The comprimise of 1850 is when Mr. Henry Clay comes back into action from our whole counrty falling apart. It was an intricate package of five bills, passed on September 4, 1850, defusing a four-year confrontation between the Slave_stateof the Southern_United_Statesand the Free_state_(USA) of the North that arose from expectation of Territorial_expansion_of_the_United_Stateswith the Texas_Annexation(December 29, 1845) and the following Mexican-American_War(1846--1848). It avoided secession or American_Civil_Warat the time and quieted sectional conflict for four years until the divisive Kansas–Nebraska_Act.The Compromise was greeted with relief though each side disliked specific provisions. Texas gave up its claim to New_Mexicobut received debt relief, El_Paso, and the Texas_Panhandle. The South did not get their keenly desired Pacific territory in Southern_Californiaor extension of the Missouri_Compromiseline allowing slavery anywhere south of Parallel_36°30'_north. As compensation, the South got the possibility of slave states via Popular_sovereigntyin the new New_Mexico_Territoryand Utah_Territory, which however were unsuited to plantation agriculture and populated by non-Southerners; a stronger Fugitive_Slave_Law_of_1850, which in practice outraged Northern public opinion; and preservation of slavery in the national capital, though the slave trade was banned there except in the Virginia portion of the District_of_Columbiawhich rejoined Virginia.The Compromise became possible after the sudden death of President Zachary_Taylorwho although a slaveowner himself tried to implement the Northern policy of excluding slavery from the Southwest. Whig_Party_(United_States) United_States_SenateHenry_Clay(Kentucky) designed a compromise which failed to pass in early 1850; in the next session of Congress, Democratic_Party_(United_States) Senator Stephen_Douglas(Illinois) and Whig Senator Daniel_Webster(Massachusetts) narrowly passed a slightly modified package over opposition by extremists on both sides including Senator and former Vice-President John_C._Calhounof South_Carolina.
got defeated.
No not really because both sides got what they wanted.
well you can say that the Missouri compromise allowed south to have slavery but north couldn't and then all went well until the compromise of 1850 when California got permitted as a free state south got mad and the civil war began. I'm writing a report on this too but includes more.
People in Utah and New Mexico got to vote to decide if they wanted to be a slave or free state.
People in Utah and New Mexico got to vote to decide if they wanted to be a slave or free state.
1. The southern states got scared of a full-on attack by the northerners 2. anti-slavery sentiments in the north grew 3. John Brown became a martyr 4. It ended the era of compromise in the US pertaining to slavery (3/5ths compromise, Missouri compromise, compromise of 1850, Kansas- Nebraska acts)
It got California admitted as free soil, on condition that two other states could be admitted as slave-states.
It changed by the sun the conditions got worse and the factory got better
he thinks he got the better end of the deal because he thinks he doesn't need his body or identity because vincent gave him what he dreamed of .
Alright, listen up! The Missouri Compromise of 1820 drew a line at 36°30' to determine slave and free states, while the Compromise of 1850 allowed California to enter as a free state and included a stricter Fugitive Slave Law. So basically, one drew a line in the sand, and the other tried to clean up a mess with a stricter law. Got it? Good.
I got no idea
The Missouri Compromise basically gave the pro-slaver states Missouri, and gave the non- slavery states Maine. This Compromise also enacted the 36-30 (36 Degrees North- 30 minutes) which made all states that entered the Union south of that line pro- slavery. This worked until they got to California, which the refused to split into two separate states. The working out of this can be found in the Compromise of 1850.
I think its tough,but in the end its got to be sunburn!