He fell with them because he angered them. He did this by banishing them from the country and allowing murderers of priests go free. This is why they spread rumours about him. He wasn't as bad as people make out he is. 0 (__) (*_*) --l__l-- // \\
this were called stips they would always pray in temples
King John succeeded his brother King Richard (Richard the Lionheart) in 1199.
The king was to blame for Thomas Becket's murder because he told the knights to kill Thomas but the knights didn't had to do what he said but they did and hit Thomas in the head and killed him. Also Thomas told the monks to leave the door open so the monks did. Also the king shouldn't have wanted to kill him anyway and the Knights had to obey the kings orders
you
thomas beckett and hernry sarroc
Gervase, a monk from Canterbury in Kent wrote "After arguing with the Pope, John ordered the few monks who remained at Canterbury, including the blind and crippled, out of the country. He said that all monks were public enemies."
Croxton Abbey, Leicestershire.
He quarrelled with the pope . This dude also killed a priest and King John just said 'release him, he has killed an enemy of mine. Untie him and let him go.' After he had quarrelled with the pope he ordered all the monks at Canterbury , including the blind and crippled, out of the country! HE said that all monks were PUBLIC ENEMIES.
John Clark Monks was born in 1760.
John Clark Monks died in 1827.
King john had a Quarrel with the pope eventually John decided to shut down all churches no weddings or praying. Monks also hated Kings too. Monks sometimes do make lies to be honest. It's absolutely true.
Cause in 1206 he quarelled with people and got the churches shut down :p stupid muppet
well king john was not a bad king but he wasn't the best either. for centuries king john was regarded as a bad king.Stories say that he taxed people enourmously and broke all the rules of the magna carta so people assumed the worst of him and thought he was a bad king and a tyrant. though historians from today have proved that the stories were written by monks and john fell out with the monks.there is a big diffirence between a good king and a good personCorrect Answer.King John taxed people enormously and broke all the rules to the Magna Carta so people assumed the worse of him and thought he was a bad king and a tyrant. The monks fell out with him and they had to write things for people around the city/village/world. Also, he monks wrote bad things about him even if they weren't true. So you definitely didn't want to fall out with the monks in those times. King John was also suspected of murdering King Richard's son, his nephew, so that he could become King; he sent King Richard on long crusades with the same intention. This is only a rumour though and has not been proved true but that is what medieval people thought.
The early monks of the midevil ages wrote with a quilland ink.
John Monks has written: 'Income inequality and the UK economy' 'The library of John Monks, Jr' -- subject(s): Bibliography, Catalogs, Booksellers' 'Brother Rat' 'Evidence'
No he didn't. King George III did.