answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

China 's history?

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What evidence do archaeologists have about china's history?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What evidence found by archaeologists that Sumerians were not prehistoric?

a a a


Why do historians need archaeologists and anthropologists to study?

This is because history is the study of the written past, while prehistory is the study of the unwritten past. Archaeologists find their answers from material which is found in the ground, and anthropologists find their answers by trying to match the human behaviour of some societies with the evidence that the archaeologists found.


What is a sentence for archaeologists?

archaeologists have found very shocking evidence. Where do archaeologists work?


How did the civil service change China's government?

It was a major rule in Chinas history.


How do archaeologists look for evidence about early people?

they do observations


What evidence found by archaeologists shows that sumerians were not prehistoric?

a a a


How did the civil service system change China government?

It was a major rule in Chinas history.


What evidence did discoveries by the Leakey's and other archaeologists provide?

Paleontological and archeological evidence about hominid evolution.


Which action is an example of periodzation?

Dividing chinas history based on which dynasty ruled the country. (APEX)


Who studies history?

Historians, Archaeologists, and Anthropologists


What is one who carefully uncovers evidence from the past called?

Someone who carefully uncovers evidence from the past is typically known as an archaeologist. Archaeologists study human history and prehistory through the excavation of sites and analysis of artifacts to understand past civilizations and societies.


Why do archaeologists sometimes disagree about how to interpret archaeological evidence?

Archaeologists may disagree about interpreting archaeological evidence due to several reasons. Firstly, interpretation often relies on fragmentary and incomplete evidence, leading to multiple plausible interpretations. Secondly, archaeologists have differing theoretical perspectives, which can influence their interpretations. Lastly, biases, personal perspectives, and subjective opinions can also contribute to disagreements among archaeologists when interpreting the past.