0
if they use their own opinion, they would not be fully trusted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The written records studied by historians often began as?
You should really look in your book when doing homework, but the answer is MYTHS.
What would a mask of ismene Greek look like?
Hm... A worried look; a look of "We should follow the rules" look; A colon-S look or...
Why might a historian use periodization when writing about ancient greek?
If he was a military historian. Other historians look at social and developments and regressions.
What has been found on cave walls?
Cave paintings have been found on cave walls throughout the world. These paintings help historians and archaeologists get a look at how people thought as much as 40,000 years ago, although why these paintings were painted are unknown.
Types of warriors?
There are many types of warriors, the Zulu, Roman, Viking... You Should look that up in a book.
Why do historians need to be careful about bias?
Historians Have To Be Careful Of Bias Because, If They Are Writting A Report About Something That Has Happened That Is Part Of History, They Might Use Bias Because They Want The Story To Be Remembered Or Famous In Some Way. But They Don't Want To Use Too Much Bias Because It May Not Be True !
When evaluating the reliability of a source information what should be considered?
When evaluating the reliability of a source, consider the author's expertise, credibility, and bias. Assess the publication date, relevance, and accuracy of the information. Look for corroborating sources and fact-check the content to determine its trustworthiness.
Are historians bias when it comes to determining a president's greatness?
Historians would attempt to be unbiased and look objectively at the president's record. Since they are human like the rest of us, it would be almost impossible for them not to allow their biases to influence their determinations from time to time, although professional historians would strive to separate personal biases from objective determinations.
What step must a historian take to evaluate historical evidence?
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
Which information would best help readers know if an author on the primary source had bias towards the subject?
Readers should look for the author's background, affiliations, and any potential conflicts of interest that could indicate bias. Additionally, analyzing the language used, the tone of the writing, and any opinions or perspectives presented can provide insights into the author's bias towards the subject. Comparing the content with other sources and considering the potential motivations behind the author's writing can also help assess bias.
The written records studied by historians often began as?
You should really look in your book when doing homework, but the answer is MYTHS.
How do you Find the pinch-off voltage for a MOSFET?
1. Look up the data sheet (specification sheet) and get it from there. 2. Set it up with a voltage supply from source to drain, apply a bias voltage to the gate, measure the bias voltage to just cut off the drain current.
What do historians look for when studying history?
they look for features of a nation
Which source of information should look to find out how a product is correctly reconstituted?
The doctor
What should you not look for when admitting a TCN into an area?
originating source of id card
What should you do if your evaluating words?
When evaluating words, consider the context in which they are used, the source of the information, and whether the words are backed up by evidence or reliable sources. Pay attention to how the words make you feel and if they are intended to persuade or manipulate. It's also important to look out for any bias or loaded language in the words you are evaluating.
When reading a primary account what should you look out for?
Any bias or agenda the writer may have Inaccuracies and untruths, which may be introduced by even the best-intentioned writers. Many of the same things you look out for when reading a secondary account.
